"Tom St Denis" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1164491026.704166.143020@45g2000cws.googlegroups.com...

There is probably someway to take advantage of another core - but I doubt it
would be trivial. Perhaps I am completely wrong - I don't know enough about
MD5

Look at the big money Intel is putting into R&D and competitions to make
seemingly iterative processes run faster on multiple cores.

In article news1.ucsd.edu>,
Greg Rose network.ucsd.edu> wrote:

I had a lot of trouble running the NIST tests on
L15, as NIST no longer supports it for Linux (only
Windows, and with a clunky user interface). But
anyway.

NIST normally recommends running the test on 125MB
of data, treated as 1000 samples of 1000000 bits
each. When run in that mode against a single
125mB stream from L15, it reported a failure of
the overlapping-templates test. Unfortunately I
clobbered this data set output and it takes so
long to re-run the test that I won't bother.

On a sunny day (25 Nov 2006 04:58:25 GMT) it happened Unruh
wrote in :

Yes I think so too.

No need to apologise, I enjoy reading the contribution by you and many others.

Tom often replied in the style of:
'That is crap', 'You have no clue', 'This subject has been discussed to death',
the a bit later some other poster points out he is wrong with good arguments,
then a fight happens.... and he often loses.
So that makes ignoring his initial replies / attacks a good policy.
Sorry if it made me drop interesting replies by any of you., it goes then something like this:

"The Spieshttp://sonic.net/~doretk/Issues/99-09%%20FALL/theexpert.html
Who Shagged Us" is a book written this creep who thinks he knows
something about the CIA-perhaps his own drug failures are haunting him,
and I know them WELL

Leo Anthony Sgouros

GLOBAL STRATEGIC SYSTEMS NEWSLETTER, January, 1997, by Markku J.
Saarelainen, SOME CONCEPTS: Organizational Improvement Network (OIN)
for Improving Competitiveness, Environmental Performance and
Profitability

Copyright 1997 Markku J. Saarelainen

GLOBAL STRATEGIC SYSTEMS NEWSLETTER

January, 1997

by

Markku J. Saarelainen

SOME CONCEPTS: Organizational Improvement Network (OIN) for Improving
Competitiveness, Environmental Performance and Profitability

We all know that it is important to have reliable, accurate and timely
information for decision making purposes to ensure adequate quality in
our decision making. However, one of the most excellent questions...

panteltje@yahoo.com writes:

Hello all,

In conjunction to reading Applied Cryptography 2nd Ed., I'm also using Cryptool as a
learning aid. In learning modern encryption algorithms I figured I'd start with the
DES, my logic being that it will give me a good foundation for learning the rest of
the algorithms.

However, I do have a question about the "circular shift" of the key after it has been
reduced to 48 bits and then split into two 28 bit halves.

Cryptool has some animated illustrations of some of the classic ciphers, and also for
DES.

This is what it shows for the first 'R' and 'L' half of the 28 bits before and after
the left circular shift, on the first round of the 16, which would make it a 1 bit
shift.

(I have aligned the shift for simplicity)

For the 'R' half:

1 0 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 1 1 1 1 0 0
1 1 1 1 0 0 0

In many ways I still see myself as an outsider so I see things perhaps
in a slightly different way.

I would like to thank sci.crypt for an educational year over a goodly
range of topics. It is an amazing gift to the public that professors,
doctors and genuine experts give their time to deal with the "small
matters" raised by non-experts.

I also thank Rodger Schlafly who puts out his crypto mini-faq every
month but rarely gets thanked for his efforts. And JS, DG, BU and JP
(who seems to be no more) - even if I disagreed with you in an OT
thread, I respected your intellect and you did change me.

Merry Christmas Sci.crypt and best wishes for the new year

In many ways I still see myself as an outsider so I see things perhaps
in a slightly different way.

I would like to thank sci.crypt for an educational year over a goodly
range of topics. It is an amazing gift to the public that professors,
doctors and genuine experts give their time to deal with the "small
matters" raised by non-experts.

I also thank Rodger Schlafly who puts out his crypto mini-faq every
monthly but rarely gets thanked for his efforts. And JS, DG, BU and JP
(who seems to be no more) - even if I disagreed with you in an OT
thread, I respected your intellect.

Merry Christmas Sci.crypt and best wishes for the new year

"Tom St Denis" gmail.com> writes:

A lot more than the point of archiving this whole discussion, or most of
the discussions on netnews.