sci.crypt
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.crypt only
 
Advanced search
November 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
  12345 44
6789101112 45
13141516171819 46
20212223242526 47
27282930    48
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.crypt Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA         


Author: Luc The Perverse
Date: Nov 26, 2006 01:45

"Tom St Denis" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1164491026.704166.143020@45g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> Felix Rawlings wrote:
>>> Um? No. You can't easily multi-thread MD5 and expect performance
>>> [especially since it's basically 64 rounds of very serial operations].
>>
>> So it would yield the same performance on a single CPU machine?
>
> I don't see why not. Discounting any other processes running that is.
>
> What makes you think you can multi-thread MD5?

There is probably someway to take advantage of another core - but I doubt it
would be trivial. Perhaps I am completely wrong - I don't know enough about
MD5

Look at the big money Intel is putting into R&D and competitions to make
seemingly iterative processes run faster on multiple cores.

--
LTP

:)
no comments