sci.crypt
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.crypt only
 
Advanced search
November 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
  12345 44
6789101112 45
13141516171819 46
20212223242526 47
27282930    48
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.crypt Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Hex to Float conversion of GPS Latitude         


Author: volosov
Date: Nov 10, 2006 18:29

I would really appreciate if someone could give me a hint
how these floats are encoded:

0B7D2F70 41.8713
0B7D232F 41.8687
0B7D220F 41.8684

This is not IEEE-754: http://babbage.cs.qc.edu/IEEE-754/Decimal.html

Thanks in advance

Vadim
10 Comments
  A Deadly Message Regarding ANNA KUBIT         


Author: WARNING!
Date: Nov 10, 2006 17:42

DXAKRWZHWHWWSRNIOJHRSRXICSQBVOVYHHCDBHILBCLQBCZEMARZJICBYSPZVMVLLVARKNPBAQKHYTBTMMTFKKQ
VEPGWFJNLONZYABAWRKSFCZVCPJDCDJXFWOTXRVGUOSWCNTYCMQGTRDFYPEKUXLFBZUSVUTTHQJIPRWQCTEQMB
MLTHTHNTJDCCHCOLXDJCOIFVICKHSNNGEMCALYDNIDXOUDOFUHKJOHIRMTVDSOJHDITSRYIGBYLPJBKREJJESBMEJIJO
CAZEQCQJAUZSUUTALKDKHZKDOVOFMXUNEEBVQMWBXWFNMQISYPGCEROSWEAEBYGMPVRYUONNJTKNKQRVHOFUZ
CGEKRWWBKXWEIRFQBUPDZJWYXQNEJHXVTJHRFAPZHMQKAOGYYVRUCOQMIJAXQJLQFNZHAHPCZCHMZZLJEHHTCSE
NYBNCYOQWJMWTGZSOKKFIOFALYSNTHNNAAEEKHCMJOONJXDGHQEGPNDUIQZVTKTZCMNZJMDEFKOGZLXSIWDTZVU
ZAJVDARRYRKOGORCDRTNBYCMFXJQGKRAXOQMCWVGJJZKTVQAPMUCQDGKTYNTXDVSULBKJOWJDBRAXSYXTETLTAE
QYCISSYSIXIPOJOYNRPPHPHYLLVEISQPDMLNMSVFBWJUXJASYKECILUJCKHSXNEWWPWOWSNRDJOLRZVGDHZLJXCWY
GPGWDEDMYHURYSBGKJRYOHLREQZQMBCGGIYVYMSCTVTNZUPASFFBYOBAHUOXZLZOBTFNQFWRVVSYBQAKRSFQZJN
EGDWEKWFCHHHGGTWTBPQBGLJCBOTODTLEEUWDHHUOSWKFNQTSUGVWPIQDXMXIEINXWSIWIPLURFEEWKIFUGYRF
ZAVTQBXTZRARUBWMMTEUREFYRCTGJEMXYSPBUQTWVDXESYGTLULJSPOUIDTVOUXGEEDKSMCZSNECCRXIWUGTVR
KFEHDEQAIHQIGBWHFAMTEDBNXHUUCGIPRNPXEXIWWBDUBRIWXGMHSIDWXSYVHMQCEXMCDFCRQVBRJXHAYPQKSP
GONEKURMSTPZSVXBMWVWZQEQUHWSFYLPKHAFMGVQPUOKUCWOPPRIQKUINUINGHQXWBQNTTIMRHMJKGUXQTFC
TMELGLPBSXKNDMDZVCHYGSBPRHCBTJIYLBYYEQNPOUECESZQSIXBXBFSQNUDZOGWBAALOJGICBUGSCAHZTAFHOABN
OGPGJOBLJCSVDSNXHUOUCUBRQKRTYZZIETKOFVNILDTRGQZOJBMAVBVUEJVGPWGFRGIZXLKKOPRMBWGXAZRKAHQPH
UWUBWGXHFDTTXCYTIEXISYZMKSUVAVDAJCGWLJULSEXZPAGLQYRIPZRFAHZORPQCCPDVMKUFBBDLXUCRVEVEFGZXO
OMXPLUOBOTCDRXGCTERPAZVEAHJQASMQNNPXSYIWPXINNTVAIQDTYALJJKCOJPMRJORDEAKEQBVXDWJTDRAHEFWA
WWJBSMKASYDDIBOMPQGBYICVTXLGFYOHDBBJQZCCETTSQKGVWMZGNLFOGISQMVUCPAGLZWBLLSYGMAJQUCJMHVD
TQDWPFAFMKBFTAYZKISFWTICCWBCHHBEMNUQLKCKCMVTGKLEEWWBGMAYJFEWCELQZNPIZLTTBAEQWERNBAOXFJX
MVLAWUFIAATJADYUWHWWHUINTYFTYGMMZAFLKLDGRVCLDQHTQJXGXGKACMTLFOZBDNILEMWEJGNLPENOUFIHQMCF ...
Show full article (2.18Kb)
no comments
  Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks         


Author: fermineutron
Date: Nov 10, 2006 16:48

Most experts argue that the quantum computers (QC) will require change
of assimetric key encryption systems. That is, the factorng of a large
number will no longer be a diffucult problem, since QC will be able to
use all possible values for prime numbers simmultaneously hence
yeilding correct pair which factors a given long number in several
clock cycles.

Now it seems to me that the problems with using cryptography when
attacker has a QM will not stop there. It is customary o assume that
attacker knows the encription algorythm and can intercept lots of data
encrypted with the same key as the messege he is trying to decrypt.

So if attacker is trying to breake encrypted text E2 and has plain text
T1 and its encrypted version E1, using the same key as used for E2, all
attaker has to do is to find a key which decrypts E1 into T1. If
quantum computers can do basic math they also can do more complex
operations, which will take loger, but will just like basic math use
all possible input output values simmultaneously, hence atacker can use
all possible keys in 1 operation (here operation is not a clock cycle
but a time required to do 1 encryption) to encrypt T1 into En and see
which En=E1, hence yeilding the key for E2.
Show full article (1.38Kb)
8 Comments
  Re: Important Information         


Author:
Date: Nov 10, 2006 16:31

hockeyboxbaseball@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Check out: www.Brandon-Lands.com
>

Do we ignore this one too?
Since it came from Google just like the in-crowd here?
no comments
  Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights         


Author: Ben Rudiak-Gould
Date: Nov 10, 2006 12:32

Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> No admin rights, no filesystem containers. And this is by design and can be
> found on any operating with system which implements common security
> criteria (C2, EAL3/EAL4+).

Really? I know it's true in practice, but I don't see why it needs to be
true. Programs with elevated privileges already need to be careful not to
trust any part of the filesystem that nonprivileged users can write to; how
could allowing unprivileged users to mount filesystem containers make things
any worse?

-- Ben
no comments
  Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal         


Author: bobandcarole
Date: Nov 10, 2006 08:34

> Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
> handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>
>
> Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
> for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
> to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
>
> http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
no comments