|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: A. M. G. SoloA. M. G. Solo
Date: Jan 19, 2007 01:01
Call for Papers
The 2007 World Congress in Computer Science,
Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing
WORLDCOMP'07
(composed of 24 Joint Conferences)
June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas, USA
Dear Colleagues:
You are invited to submit a draft/full paper. All accepted papers will
be published in the respective conference proceedings. The academic
co-sponsors of WORLDCOMP'07 include: MIT Media Lab, MIT; Harvard
University's Statistical Genomics and Computational Biology Lab; Texas
Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin;
Statistical
and Computational Intelligence Lab of Purdue University; University of
Iowa's Medical Imaging HPC Lab., and Institute for Informatics Problems
of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. A more complete
list of sponsors can be found below.
|
| Show full article (9.75Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: oblivio_noblivio_n
Date: Jan 15, 2007 06:37
Hi everyone,
I developed a 256-state cellular automaton that serves as a random
number generator. It's more than three times faster than the GNU
Scientific Library RNGs I tested (taus, gfsr4, mt19937, and ranlxd1)
and scores very well on the Diehard tests.
It's fast because the algorithm is basically an array lookup with
pointer value updates.
Alas, there is no proof about cycles or such, but the statistical
results so far are very good. Enjoy.
Code and results are here:
http://home.southernct.edu/~pasqualonia1/ca/report.html
Tony Pasqualoni
|
| |
|
| |
3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: CristianoCristiano
Date: Jan 13, 2007 02:45
Bob Jenkins wrote:
> John Blackman has a test ("nda", it measures gaps between pairs of
> four-bit chunks) that found bias in this generator after about 1 GBytes.
"nda" or "dna"? Do you have a link for that test?
Cristiano
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: btconnectbtconnect
Date: Jan 3, 2007 23:22
Hi,
Does anyone think a geiger (radiation) based
real number generator would be of interest ?
We are developing a small battery powered
unit for a project and may market it to the public
if it is viable.
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Ken_11010111Ken_11010111
Date: Dec 30, 2006 17:04
Hi Guys!
I'm new to your group so I thought I would drop you a note and Let you
know about
a new real random number generator I have written called Indium.
It is a real random number generator not a pseduo-random one. It was
written in C
and I have placed all 900+ C functions inot the public domain. As a
open source
project I used every major encryption algorithm, one way hash function
and hundreds
more that I could find into it. Because of it's size and complexity it
is very sloooow
but the numbers it generates should be about as good as you can get.
I have incorporated Indium into a equally large encryption program I
call Vegas Vault.
If your interested in checking out either program the web site address
is:
www.sincitysoftware.serverheaven.net
Both programs are open source and freeware. Enjoy!
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: mashi3981mashi3981
Date: Dec 23, 2006 00:20
Hello,
The BBC news articles below address privacy concerns
over states' and corporations' use of personal data.
I think you will find the links useful.
Thanks,
Mashi
The basic summary is the following:
1. States collect personal info by various methods
(eg:CCTV/closed-circuit TV in roadways).
Corporations collect personal info by various means
(eg:credit card transactions...
|
| Show full article (2.67Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Bob JenkinsBob Jenkins
Date: Dec 13, 2006 12:23
This C code snippet is my current favorite pseudorandom number
generator for statistical purposes:
typedef unsigned long int u4;
typedef struct randctx { u4 a; u4 b; u4 c; u4 d; } randctx;
u4 rand( randctx *x ) {
u4 e = x->a;
x->a = x->b;
x->b = (x->c<<19) + (x->c>>13) + x->d;
x->c = x->d ^ x->a;
x->d = e + x->b;
return x->c;
}
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
|
7 Comments |
|
  |
Author:
Date: Dec 6, 2006 08:39
Mpilot gmail.com> wrote:
>Kristian Gj
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Dec 6, 2006 01:38
Mpilot gmail.com> wrote:
>Kristian Gj
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Joseph AshwoodJoseph Ashwood
Date: Dec 6, 2006 01:31
>> But if you
>> genuinely want your system analyzed for pay then I am available, and I
>> have
>> walked people through the entire process before, but no cryptanalyst
>> comes
>> cheap. I will spoil the ending for you though, your system will fail to
>> meet
>> the Information-Theoretic security goal you laid out.
>
> I can send you a file which is encoded with the FreeMove Quantum
> Exchange. I will pay you an amount on which we can agree in advance, if
> you send me the the decoded source file, including the method how you
> decoded the encoded source file, without having the private key.
You really should try reading what I write before you delete it:
> Now you are showing that you don't understand cryptography at all. Might I
> suggest reading some history surrounding the breaking of Enigma.
|
| Show full article (2.99Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|