UV the Gorilla in the Room
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.bio.evolution only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

sci.bio.evolution Profile…
 Up
UV the Gorilla in the Room         


Author: Tom Hendricks
Date: Mar 2, 2008 11:09

Some ideas from:
The ultraviolet history of the terrestrial planets Ð implications
for biological evolution
Charles S. Cockell*,1
M/S 239-20, NASA Ames Research Center, Mo􏰣ett Field, CA 94035-1000,
USA
Received 24 June 1999; accepted 27 August 1999

'Using observations of stars, Zahnle and Walker provide spectra for
the sun at 3.5 Ga and present-day.
The 25%% reduction in luminosity corresponds to an approximately 35%%
reduction in the biologically im-
portant UV range (Zahnle and Walker, 1982). Solar
luminosity was assumed to increase linearly over time to present-day
values. '

UV was lower at the start - though I've heard that the new sun (4.5?)
was higher UV.
So it may have started out high, and come down a bit. Then increased
till the ozone shield developed.
Show full article (2.03Kb)
2 Comments
Re: UV the Gorilla in the Room         


Author: Tom Hendricks
Date: Mar 5, 2008 23:18

The following from a study cited in my paper
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/3/1
I've cited it many times before, but it still is more
relevant than ever specially since we have been talking
in other threads about the problem of bases.

Excerpt:

Results
As condensation of sugar phosphates and nitrogenous bases is
thermodynamically unfavorable, these compounds, if ever formed, should
have undergone rapid hydrolysis. Thus, formation of oligonucleotide...
Show full article (1.61Kb)
no comments
Re: UV the Gorilla in the Room         


Author: Tom Hendricks
Date: Mar 5, 2008 23:18

On Mar 2, 1:09 pm, Tom Hendricks att.net> wrote:
> Some ideas from:
>  The ultraviolet history of the terrestrial planets Ð implications
> for biological evolution
> Charles S. Cockell*,1
> M/S 239-20, NASA Ames Research Center, Mo􏰣ett Field, CA 94035-1000,
> USA
> Received 24 June 1999; accepted 27 August 1999
>
> 'Using observations of stars, Zahnle and Walker provide spectra for
> the sun at 3.5 Ga and present-day.
> The 25%% reduction in luminosity corresponds to an   approximately 35%%
> reduction in the biologically im-
> portant UV range (Zahnle and Walker, 1982). Solar
> luminosity was assumed to increase linearly over time to present-day
> values. '
>
> UV was lower at the start - though I've heard that the new sun (4.5?)
> was higher UV.
> So it may have started out high, and come down a bit. Then increased ...
Show full article (7.11Kb)
no comments