Re: Memes controlling evolution
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.bio.evolution only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Memes controlling evolution         

Group: sci.bio.evolution · Group Profile
Author: Entertained by my own EIMC
Date: May 17, 2008 14:53

"John W Edser" ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:g0cmbb$1o1c$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
>
> Unlike most genes, memes easily leap from
> person to person without a new body
> being reproduced every time. The net result
> of this is that an unfit meme can take over
> what is just a shrinking population, killing
> in a cancerous way. Like the independently
> segregating but dependently selected "selfish
> genes" (which remain predicated on Hamilton's
> oversimplified i.e. deletion of a critical
> theory constant, model) cancerous selfish
> cells and selfish memes cannot be
> independently selected. This means that a
> gene, a cell or a meme must increase the
> total number of fertile forms reproduced
> per parent per population (which I define
> as Total Darwinian Fitness TDF), in order
> to be selected for.
>
> It does not matter what Darwinian sub
> part you choose, the only way that
> it can be selected for empirically is
> via an increase in TDF (which presents
> the only falsifiable fitness maximand
> that we have).

John,
What is realistically required is a 'lucky minimum' of at least one pregnant
or positively otherwise on the verge of reproducing "TDF _countee_";

Thus called (referring to "countee") because I cautiously kept my "mind"
[or, synonymously and EPTly (>~=seriously and only deceptively facetiously)
put, my to a staggeringly significant but seldom understood extent
"ambiadvantageously" evolved "Actention Selection System"] on the fact that
our feared or revered (whichever comes first ;>) moderator is American. %%-}

Regards,
P
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!