This is the SECOND MESSAGE:

Let me address a few of the reasons why INFORMAL LOGIC is what we humans
are constrained to rely upon in the process of what literally is (by the
second part of the American Heritage (c) definition) of *FORENSICS*. But
first let me sew together this message with the first one by saying that
definition (1) and definition (2) (see first message) are not unrelated to
one another. If this is not clear from what is written so far in this
thread, it shall become much clearer, as the thread progresses.

First of all, pure logic (synonymous with pure mathematics) is -- for
purposes of evolutionary biology forensics (EBF) -- one of the more valuable
tools, but totally useless by itself alone. Will not even attempt to
exhaust the reasons why, but here are just a few: