I completely agree with you. The information provided in a peer-
reviewed paper should be enough for a acapable person to recreate.
ReMine should look at Nunney's assumption and see if they are valid,
then he can publish his own paper. That is the best way to go about
it.
[moderator's note: In all the excitement, I missed the actual citation
to the article in question; could someone provide that so we can ALL
go read the paper? - JAH]
On Apr 18, 11:26 am, Lorentz
yahoo.com> wrote:>> In addition, if you re-create the simulation and get...
