| Re: Evolution is NOT random |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: sci.bio.evolution · Group Profile
Author: VirgilVirgil Date: Jul 25, 2008 10:00
In article darwin.ediacara.org>,
John Edser ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Virgil gmale.com> wrote:-
>>
>>>> You choose to DEFINE quantum events as those imperceptible to humans
>>>> without some sort of mechanical assistance.
>>>> I do not.
>
>>> JE:-
>>> No, I argued (above) that quantum changes cannot be perceived using just
>>> the human senses. IOW, a machine is required to observe a quantum change.
>
>> Which human perception of a single light quantum being absorbed by the
>> retina disproves.
>
> JE:-
> Even the perception of one photon by the human retina, if proved, does
> not constitute the perception of one quantum CHANGE.
Such a perception itself constitutes the CHANGE in a light quantum into
something else.
|