|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: feedbackdroidfeedbackdroid Date: Dec 22, 2007 19:24
|
| |
|
| | 14 Comments |
|
|
Author: DKDK Date: Dec 24, 2007 15:28
feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>
>Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems biology
Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious. Apparently,
techniques associated with it are:
Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, glycomics,
interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
I am shocked at the omission of another brand new dispicpline
of science - "lipidomics" :-)
DK
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
|
Author: feedbackdroidfeedbackdroid Date: Dec 25, 2007 12:28
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DKDK Date: Dec 27, 2007 12:58
feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>On Dec 24, 4:28
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tim TylerTim Tyler Date: Dec 27, 2007 12:58
DK wrote:
> feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>> Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems biology
>
> Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
> Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious. Apparently,
> techniques associated with it are:
> Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, glycomics,
> interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: gruebaitgruebait Date: Dec 27, 2007 12:58
> feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>>
>>Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems
>>biology
>
> Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
> Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious.
> Apparently, techniques associated with it are:
> Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics,
> glycomics,
> interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
>
> I am shocked at the omission of another brand new
> dispicpline of science - "lipidomics" :-)
>
> DK
>
Wikipedia...
|
| Show full article (0.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DKDK Date: Dec 28, 2007 11:23
gruebait aintsaying.com> wrote:>> feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>>>
>>>Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems
>>>biology
>>
>> Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
>> Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious.
>> Apparently, techniques associated with it are:
>> Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics,
>> glycomics,
>> interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
>>
>> I am shocked at the omission of another brand new
>> dispicpline of science - "lipidomics" :-)
>>
>> DK
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DKDK Date: Dec 28, 2007 11:23
Tim Tyler cyberspace.org> wrote:>DK wrote:
>> feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems biology
>>
>> Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
>> Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious. Apparently,
>> techniques associated with it are:
>> Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, glycomics,
>> interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
Yes, it is.
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Perplexed in PeoriaPerplexed in Peoria Date: Dec 28, 2007 11:23
> feedbackdroid yahoo.com> wrote:>>
>>Some of us feel that the future of biology is systems biology
>
> Oh, the new kid on the block in the buzzwords department.
> Just looked Wikipedia article on it. LOL, hilarious. Apparently,
> techniques associated with it are:
> Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, glycomics,
> interactomics, fluxomics (!!!) and biomics.
>
> I am shocked at the omission of another brand new dispicpline
> of science - "lipidomics" :-)
Which just shows that systems biology has nothing useful to
say about the origin of life.
;-)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: feedbackdroidfeedbackdroid Date: Dec 30, 2007 23:22
>
> Which just shows that systems biology has nothing useful to
> say about the origin of life.
> ;-)
Maybe, maybe not. Maybe just knowing the bits and pieces, ACGT, etc,
at the purely reductionist level will suffice.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
