> On Feb 12, 2:19 pm, Matt aol.com> wrote:
>

>> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
>> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is
>> objective. Congratulations on your hard work.

>
> Well, I would suggest that a posting name of " Israeldid911 " rather
> takes
> away from any possible claim of " objectivity "...
>

>> There is, of course, no "controversy," only the laughable assertions
>> that A) NASA could not solve well-known problems of trajectories,
>> energy, radiation, etc. for a moon mission despite the Ranger probes
>> and Surveyor soft-landers preparing the way,

>
> Don't forget the Lunar Orbiters, too. So, both direct ascent and lunar
> orbital insertions were, by the time of Apollo, well understood and
> practiced tasks.
>

>> and B) The people who
>> went to the moon, tracked the lunar spaceships, handled logistics,
>> etc. - including trackers in the USSR who had every motive to expose
>> any US deception - were all members of a grand conspiracy of which NO
>> paperwork and not a single verifiable witness statement has ever come
>> to light.

>
> Of course. The real issue is simply whackjob nuttery, because the
> folks who
> screech " we never landed on the Moon ", and often enough, the same
> ones
> who also screech " Oswald didn't kill JFK ", and " 9/11 was a hoax ".
>
> No facts or truth ever come from such nutjob sources.
>
> Andre