On Feb 12, 2:19 pm, Matt
aol.com> wrote:> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is
> objective. Congratulations on your hard work.
Well, I would suggest that a posting name of " Israeldid911 " rather
takes
away from any possible claim of " objectivity "...
> There is, of course, no "controversy," only the laughable assertions
> that A) NASA could not solve well-known problems of trajectories,
> energy, radiation, etc. for a moon mission despite the Ranger probes
> and Surveyor soft-landers preparing the way,
Don't forget the Lunar Orbiters, too. So, both direct ascent and lunar
orbital insertions were, by the time of Apollo, well understood and
practiced tasks.
> and B) The people who
> went to the moon, tracked the lunar spaceships, handled logistics,
> etc. - including trackers in the USSR who had every motive to expose
> any US deception - were all members of a grand conspiracy of which NO
> paperwork and not a single verifiable witness statement has ever come
> to light.
Of course. The real issue is simply whackjob nuttery, because the
folks who
screech " we never landed on the Moon ", and often enough, the same
ones
who also screech " Oswald didn't kill JFK ", and " 9/11 was a hoax ".
No facts or truth ever come from such nutjob sources.
Andre
