> Did We Go to the Moon or Not?
>
> By: David John Oates
> redwo...@adam.com.au
>
> It has been a huge controversy over the past several years, even the
> topic of a TV special. Did we really go to the moon or not? Did NASA
> fake the moon landings? Now one Reverse Speech Practitioner, Karina
> Kaiser, has come out with a set of reversals that she claims proves we
> did not go to the moon. Her reversals can be seen here -http://www.reversespeechinternational.com/moonlanding.php.
>
> It has always been the opinion of this author that we did go to the
> moon, and I have not been convinced with arguments that say we did not
> go. This website examined the question of whether we went to the moon
> or not a couple of years ago and our results were posted here -http://www.reversespeech.com/apollo.htm.
>
> Probably the most significant reversal we found is this one here...
>
> "I don't accept the Bible as a [gospel of any]thing except a
> historical record. But we did go to the moon. You betcha sweet ass we
> went to the moon." Inevitable saga (Congruent. Confirming what he is
> saying forward. Saga is a historical record, a chronology of events
> and it was inevitable because mankind was destined to go to the moon.)
>
> I interpreted this reversal as he was telling a true story and an
> accurate chronology of historical events. In another example, the
> reversal confirms what he is saying forwards.
>
> "Now what that all meant I don't know, but it wasn't the kind of
> radiation that gave us a problem of any kind. You could see it. You
> could close your eyes and just [see these things] shoot by." You see
> this (Talking about travelling through the radiation belt. A congruent
> reversal indicating they did travel through the belt.)
>
> Given these seemingly congruent reversals, I was very surprised when
> Karina Kaiser came out with her results. This has prompted me to
> examine her claims and her reversals closely. Here are my analysis
> results of each reversal she has posted. My overall conclusion is
> posted at the end of this analysis.
>
> Reversal 1 - Karina's comments:
>
> Walter Cronkite, US Broadcast Journalist and CBS's former Anchorman
> reports live Apollo 11 lift-off:
>
> 1. Thirty-two minutes (past the) hour lift off on Apollo 11...
> It sucks - what an odd thing to say....
>
> Reversal 1 - My comments
>
> Karina has only documented a small portion of the reversal. The whole
> reversal says Apollo 11 not perfect. Ah. It sucks (click on reversal
> to download mp3 file in this file and others to follow). What does he
> mean by Apollo 11 is not perfect? I don't know.
>
> Reversal 2 - Karina's
>
> Unknown Houston speaker:
>
> 2. Apollo 11 - (this is Houston, ID check), over?
> Guys, stay down the street - down the street or up in space??
>
> Reversal 2 - My comments
>
> I don't think this reversal is clear enough to document. "Guys" is not
> clear at all, and even if it is there, it could mean anything. Houston
> Space Centre is a big place, he could have been thinking about another
> part of the centre.
>
> Reversal 3 - Karina's comments
>
> Apollo 11 to Houston July 1969
>
> 1. You never get a role from them..
> Bad rapport. Can I come in? ? - Lets suppose that this conversation
> between Apollo 11 & Houston took place in a recording studio. Then
> this reversal might say: "I don't understand, can I come in to your
> studio room (and you show me what you want me to do)."
>
> Reversal 3 - My comments
>
> This audio is too bad to really document and that very fact may
> explain the reversal. I hear the reversal as "Bad rapport, do I come
> in." This is classic radio talk, Bad rapport (the signals are bad) "do
> i come in", or can you hear me? Nothing sinister in that.
>
> Reversal 4 - Karina's comments
>
> Buzz Aldrin Jr, Apollo 11 Astronaut:
>
> 2 . Well we shut out the sun coming in from [the other window into]
> the spacecraft so...
> Remember the Lie
>
> Reversal 4 - My comments
>
> I agree with this reversal. But what is the lie he is remembering?
>
> Reversal 5 - Karina's comments
>
> 3. ...so ah it's blocking through a ah the ah number one window [and
> there isn't any] reflective light.
> Hyena paranoid
>
> Hyena in Reverse Speech describes deceptive cunning and conniving
> behaviour and indicates someone with ulterior motives who can not be
> trusted.
>
> Reversal 5 - My comments
>
> I agree with this reversal and the Reverse Speech metaphor dictionary
> definition. But what are they being deceptive about?"
>
> Reversal 6 - Karina's comments
>
> Apollo 11 - Neil Armstrong 20 July 1969
>
> 1.I'm at the foot of the ladder, the LM (Lunar Module) footrests are
> only ah depressed in the surface about ah one or two inches although
> the surface appears to be ah very very [fine grained as you get close]
> to it, it's almost like powder
> Joke engineered now
>
> Reversal 6 - My comments
>
> This reversal is too imprecise to be documented. Too many syllables
> and "engineered" can be heard several different ways
>
> Reversal 7 - Karina's comments
>
> 2. That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind
> Man will spacewal(k) -This is a future tense reversal indicating
> it had not taken place yet
>
> Reversal 7 - My comments
>
> I have been playing this reversal for years and explain it very simply
> as Armstrong is expressing his hope for the future of mankind in space
> as he steps onto the lunar surface. Just because I will have dinner
> tomorrow doesn't mean i didn't have dinner today. The same is true for
> this reversal.
>
> Continuedhttp://www.reversespeech.com/moonhoax.htm