|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:14
On Mar 30, 2:20 pm, Disneygeek hotmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 13, 1:20 pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Feb 12, 11:19 am, Matt aol.com> wrote:>
>>> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
>>> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is
>>> objective. Congratulations on your hard work.
>
>>> There is, of course, no "controversy," only the laughable assertions
>>> that A) NASA could not solve well-known problems of trajectories,
>>> energy, radiation, etc. for a moom mission despite the Ranger probes
>>> and Surveyor soft-landers preparing the way, and B) The people who
>>> went to the moon, tracked the lunar spaceships, handled logistics,
>>> etc. - including trackers in the USSR who had every motive to expose
>>> any US deception - were all members of a grand conspiracy of which NO
>>> paperwork and not a single verifiable witness statement has ever come
>>> to light. ...
|
| Show full article (2.71Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:16
On Mar 30, 2:22 pm, Disneygeek hotmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 14, 2:46 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Feb 13, 8:59 pm, isw witzend.com> wrote:>
>>> In article
>>> i72g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,>
>>> BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Feb 12, 1:03 pm, Andre Lieven wrote:>>>>> On Feb 12, 2:19 pm, Matt aol.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
>>>>>> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is
>>>>>> objective. Congratulations on your hard work.
>
>>>>> Well, I would suggest that a posting name of " Israeldid911 " rather
>>>>> takes ...
|
| Show full article (3.53Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:17
We simply have not walked on the moon, and not that orbiting the hell
out of it and getting our brave crews safely to/from the moon's L1 was
not impressive enough. Instead of knowing the whole truth, we have
been infomercial spammed by our "no child left behind" policy, of
being disinformed to the point of our being systematically snookered
and dumbfounded, most of us past the point of no return, with others
merely snookered and dumbfounded into the poor house if not death by
those few of us having the right stuff.
In no uncertain terms, you simply can not manage to hide Venus from
the unfiltered Kodak eye, especially as viewed from the physically
dark surface of our naked moon.
Terribly sorry about all that, and there's certainly lots more about
the official word of our NASA that simply does not add up to
representing the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Of which our
Apollo hoax (apollohoax) is the truth, even if we'd honestly tried to
pull off the real thing doesn't change what had actually transpired
and having been officially recorded as yet another cold-war lie.
|
| Show full article (6.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BDKBDK Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:18
> On Mar 30, 1:33 pm, BDK magicsteel.com> wrote:>>
>> Excuse me while I rest, I'm tired from all the eye rolling I'm doing
>> when reading your...stuff.
>>
>> BDK
>
> As per usual, you're not here to constructively help, so what's the
> difference?
Help? Help you? I think that ship has sailed Brad.
>
> BTW, what's magic about steel? What does BDK stand for, if anything?
> . - Brad Guth
>
There's nothing magic about steel, it's a joke about the claims the 911
troofers make about steel buildings, and the supposed pools of molten
steel that were under the wreckage for weeks.
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:31
On Mar 30, 4:18 pm, BDK magicsteel.com> wrote:>> On Mar 30, 1:33 pm, BDK magicsteel.com> wrote:>
>>> Excuse me while I rest, I'm tired from all the eye rolling I'm doing
>>> when reading your...stuff.
>
>>> BDK
>
>> As per usual, you're not here to constructively help, so what's the
>> difference?
>
> Help? Help you? I think that ship has sailed Brad.
>
>
>
>> BTW, what's magic about steel? What does BDK stand for, if anything?
>> . - Brad Guth ...
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BDKBDK Date: Mar 30, 2008 19:04
> On Mar 30, 4:18 pm, BDK magicsteel.com> wrote:>>> On Mar 30, 1:33 pm, BDK magicsteel.com> wrote:>>
>>>> Excuse me while I rest, I'm tired from all the eye rolling I'm doing
>>>> when reading your...stuff.
>>
>>>> BDK
>>
>>> As per usual, you're not here to constructively help, so what's the
>>> difference?
>>
>> Help? Help you? I think that ship has sailed Brad.
>>
>>
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DisneygeekDisneygeek Date: Mar 30, 2008 19:17
On Mar 30, 8:14Â pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 30, 2:20 pm, Disneygeek hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Feb 13, 1:20 pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Feb 12, 11:19 am, Matt aol.com> wrote:>
>>>> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
>>>> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is
>>>> objective. Â Congratulations on your hard work.
>
>>>> There is, of course, no "controversy," only the laughable assertions
>>>> that A) NASA could not solve well-known problems of trajectories,
>>>> energy, radiation, etc. for a moom  mission despite the Ranger probes
>>>> and Surveyor soft-landers preparing the way, and B) The people who
>>>> went to the moon, tracked the lunar spaceships, handled logistics, ...
|
| Show full article (3.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DisneygeekDisneygeek Date: Mar 30, 2008 19:17
On Mar 30, 8:16Â pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 30, 2:22 pm, Disneygeek hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Feb 14, 2:46 am, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Feb 13, 8:59 pm, isw witzend.com> wrote:>
>>>> In article
>>>> i72g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,>
>>>> Â BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:>>>>> On Feb 12, 1:03 pm, Andre Lieven wrote:>>>>>> On Feb 12, 2:19 pm, Matt aol.com> wrote:>
>>>>>>> The original post here is one of the more clever versions I've seen of
>>>>>>> burying a topic in gobbledygook that makes it look like the poster is ...
|
| Show full article (3.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BenjBenj Date: Mar 31, 2008 01:37
On Feb 12, 3:19 pm, Matt aol.com> wrote:
> B) The people who
> went to the moon, tracked the lunar spaceships, handled logistics,
> etc. - including trackers in the USSR who had every motive to expose
> any US deception - were all members of a grand conspiracy of which NO
> paperwork and not a single verifiable witness statement has ever come
> to light.
The "reverse speech" thing is hardly any proof, but Matt's arguments
are no better! Just WHO does he think he's fooling here? Anyone with
any political savvy at all knows that the old "if there is any
evidence of this, then why can't you show me it?" is total bullshit
when dealing with governments. They have limitless money, limitless
personnel, limitless authority, plenty of time, and pretty good
connections with other important factors like media. They go around
gathering up all tapes, papers, witnesses, and evidence for ANY
conspiracy and then the paid "debunkers" come out with the age old
argument, well, if this is true, then SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE (which
we've already gathered up and disposed of)!
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Mar 31, 2008 10:19
On Mar 30, 6:17 pm, Disneygeek hotmail.com> wrote:>
> Explain yourself. Oh no wait, you're Brad Guth. You state things as
> fact without ever explaining WHERE you got your information from!
So, I have to further explain (as though it has never once been
explained before) so that you folks of perpetual denial and of
evidence exclusion which don't have to believe in those regular laws
of physics...
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
| 9 Comments |
|
|
|
|
