> On May 8, 10:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> Although Silly Vesselin Petkov was very close to the truth:

>

>>http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9810030v13
>> Silly Vesselin Petkov: "It has been overlooked that the wavelength of
>> a photon in the gravitational redshift experiment cannot change along
>> with its frequency due to the conservation of the photon momentum. As
>> both frequency and velocity change in this experiment the measurement
>> of a change in a photon frequency is in fact an indirect measurement
>> of a change in the photon local velocity."

>

>> Criminal Tom Roberts managed to confuse him irreversibly and now Silly
>> Vesselin Petkov is very far from the truth. Here is an Einsteinian
>> that Criminal Tom Roberts has not confused yet so this particular
>> Einsteinian is still very close to the truth:

>

>>http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp\"The first confirmation of a
>> long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
>> 1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
>> previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
>> speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
>> field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
>> place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
>> relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
>> vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
>> special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
>> referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
>> light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
>> varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
>> Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
>> mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
>> the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
>> surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
>> Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
>> Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
>> gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
>> in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
>> the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
>> One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
>> where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
>> measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
>> REDSHIFT FACTOR."

>
> So if Criminal Tom Roberts had not confused Silly Vesselin Petkov so
> irreversibly, Silly Vesselin Petkov could say to Silly Ian Morison:
>
> http://fora.tv/2008/02/21/Ian_Morison_on_Einstein_s_Relativity_in_Action
>
> Silly Vesselin Petkov: "Hey, Silly Ian Morison, Pound and Rebka did
> not prove the existence of any gravitational time dilation! Rather,
> although they did not know it, they proved the validity of Einstein's
> 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) showing how the speed of light varies with
> the gravitaional potential V. If they had known how to apply
> Einstein's equivalence principle in such cases, they would also have
> shown the validity of the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's emission
> theory of light, where v is the relative speed of the light source and
> the observer."
>
> Silly Vesselin Petkov will never say that to Silly Ian Morison because
> Criminal Tom Roberts managed to confuse him irreversibly.

>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -