>On May 9, 2:41 am, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>> On May 8, 10:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> Although Silly Vesselin Petkov was very close to the truth...

> On May 9, 2:41 am, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On May 8, 10:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>> Although Silly Vesselin Petkov was very close to the truth:

>

>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9810030v13
>>> Silly Vesselin Petkov: "It has been overlooked that the wavelength of
>>> a photon in the gravitational redshift experiment cannot change along
>>> with its frequency due to the conservation of the photon momentum. As
>>> both frequency and velocity change in this experiment the measurement
>>> of a change in a photon frequency is in fact an indirect measurement
>>> of a change in the photon local velocity."

>

>>> Criminal Tom Roberts managed to confuse him irreversibly and now Silly ...

> On May 11, 1:13 pm, Mike wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On May 9, 2:41 am, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>> On May 8, 10:29 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>> Although Silly Vesselin Petkov was very close to the truth:

>

>>>>http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9810030v13
>>>> Silly Vesselin Petkov: "It has been overlooked that the wavelength of
>>>> a photon in the gravitational redshift experiment cannot change along
>>>> with its frequency due to the conservation of the photon momentum. As
>>>> both frequency and velocity change in this experiment the measurement
>>>> of a change in a photon frequency is in fact an indirect measurement
>>>> of a change in the photon local velocity." ...

> On May 11, 7:09 pm, Pentcho Valev yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> On May 11, 1:13 pm, Mike wrote:

>>> I think everything about theories should be ok in the ngs, even
>>> trolling, but yet I recommend not characterizing anyone as criminal,
>>> especially Roberts, with whom I have had many arguments with but he is
>>> a good scienstist and does nto deserve this.

>

>> Only a criminal can teach Einstein zombie world that, even if "light
>> in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz
>> transform", special relativity "would be unaffected":

>

>> http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/8034dc146...
>> Tom Roberts, Feb 1 2006: "If it is ultimately discovered that the
>> photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the
>> invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but
>> both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their
>> domains of applicability would be reduced)."

> ...

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/5497a506...?
> "Redshift - Does wavelength change?"
>
> Silly Vesselin Petkov has discovered that the gravitational redshift
> is due to the variation of the speed of light in a gravitational
> field, in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2), but
> Criminal Tom Roberts fiercely confuses Silly Vesselin Petkov and does
> not allow him to leave the zombie group in Einstein criminal cult and
> become hypnotist.