 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: May 28, 2008 09:28
I suppose this projection is a Mercator Projection of the galaxies,
but if wrong, I stand correction.
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/
Looking at Figure 11
z < 0.01 largest ring-like structure, and larger than the P-P ring.
And if you
look closely you can see that there are two rings of this purple color
close together
especially on the leftside. But especially notice the oblong shape in
the right hemisphere, which I am going to contend is a third smaller
ring once a optic correction is applied
|
| Show full article (3.31Kb) |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: May 28, 2008 09:52
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> So what I am saying is that feed these layer pictures into a computer
> and command it to make concentric rings, and it would not surprize
> me in the least bit that the computer ends with an answer of the
> shape of the observable cosmos as a huge Lobe shaped figure
> where the nipple end is the z > 0.06 layer and the huge round end
> is the z < 0.01 layer where Earth and Milky Way reside and that
> the galaxies are all placed in concentric rings and in between the
> rings are voids.
>
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: porky_pig_jrporky_pig_jr Date: May 28, 2008 17:26
>
> It would not surprize me if the shape was a positive curvature of a
> sausage
> like balloon with one nipple end.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: Jun 2, 2008 11:09
At the moment I am on vacation from further internet book publishing
and furthering ideas. A
vacation to organize the books already published on the Internet. I
had reached a level of
disorder to where I could not easily find where I had stopped or
paused in other books
and where I could not coordinate things. The analogy of working from a
house but where
the house is so untidy and need of order, that you can hardly get
other work done, and
so drop everything and clean up the house.
|
| Show full article (3.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: Jun 3, 2008 10:58
As I left this thread June 1, I assumed a huge idea which I did not
elaborate or detail. So I want
to especially remember that assumption going into the 2nd edition of
this book.
The assumption was that the Observable Cosmos can be either Euclidean
geometry or
positive Elliptic geometry or negative Hyperbolic geometry, and I
assumed that the north
and south hemispheres of Earth viewing the cosmic skies, if we look
far enough that we
should be able to tell if the observable Cosmos is a Elliptic Lobe
shaped cosmos. I assumed
that, but gave no details or elaboration.
I probably gave no details because to me it is commonsense, but to
those who have
been brainwashed by other false and fake theories like the Big Bang,
well, they need
alot of talk to get them out of their delusions.
|
| Show full article (3.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: Jun 4, 2008 00:24
Sorry, I seem to be sticking around longer than anticipated. I am
making good progress
in organizing the books published and found a way to make the titles
easy and efficient
and easy to coordinate. So cleaning up is beneficial in many ways. But
I seem to be
sticking around on this topic to shake out all the ideas before I
leave it completely until
the 2nd edition. While still fresh on my mind I should include it or I
may forget it.
It will take at least this month of June to organize all those books
which looks to be
more than 30.
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> As I left this thread June 1, I assumed a huge idea which I did not
> elaborate or detail. So I want
> to especially remember that assumption going into the 2nd edition of...
|
| Show full article (8.57Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: porky_pig_jrporky_pig_jr Date: Jun 4, 2008 18:36
On Jun 4, 3:24 am, plutonium.archime...@ gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, I seem to be sticking around longer than anticipated. I am
> making good progress
> in organizing the books published and found a way to make the titles
> easy and efficient
> and easy to coordinate. So cleaning up is beneficial in many ways. But
> I seem to be
> sticking around on this topic to shake out all the ideas before I
> leave it completely until
> the 2nd edition. While still fresh on my mind I should include it or I
> may forget it.
>
> It will take at least this month of June to organize all those books
> which looks to be
> more than 30.
>
>
>
with each being bestseller and recommended by Oprah. Honestly.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: Jun 5, 2008 08:18
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Minutes after I posted the above today, I realized that using the
> Northern and
> Southern Hemispheres is in effect a huge gigantic triangle. But
> instead of having
> to measure distance and thus...
|
| Show full article (4.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: plutonium.archimedesplutonium.archimedes Date: Jun 5, 2008 11:07
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> No-one would have expected in the 20th century to have built
> telescopes
> in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres to collate and tell the
> geometry
> of the Cosmos. And yet, mathematicians would still be able to adjust
> the
> "baseline of the triangle" given the fact that the telescopes would
> not
> be podal and antipodal in the hemispheres. So this adjustment
> correction
> can be overcome by a mathematical correction.
>
> However, the Hubble Space Telescope could easily perform the
> experiment
> of making itself a podal, antipodal Northern and Southern Hemisphere.
> Here
> on Earth we have to build observatories which is time consuming and
> costly ...
|
| Show full article (4.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
