> According to Michael Mumma in a PBS NOVA show, Comets contain twice as
> much heavy water
> as does water on Earth and so comets should not be the source of
> Earth's water.
>
> But let me apply some logic to this idea of comets and how Earth
> gained so much water. If planets were
> biological species wanting a name, then Earth should rightfully be
> called the watery planet. But applying
> logic, which Mumma should have applied since he seems to be stuck on
> this idea. We see alot of scientists
> who fall in love with an idea but unable to apply logic that would or
> should coax them away from the idea because
> the logic shows how impractical. It is easy to see how Mumma would
> have fallen for this idea that Earth water
> source was comets. Fallen because the simplicity of comets as the
> source. But here the logic steps into
> the picture and makes the idea of Comets as Earth's water source look
> rather absurd. Previously the idea
> of comets looked like simplicity and a winner, but applying logic
> makes the idea of comets look silly and
> absurd. The logical question that Mumma should have asked himself
> before falling in love with a Comet
> Model for Earth's water is how does the Comets gain all their water
> and why are they mostly a bag of
> flying water in the solar system?
>
> So you see, that Mumma falls in love with a comet model that by its
> sheer simplicity would explain
> Earths vast watery surface, but then a bit of logic would ask, "well,
> if comets are the source of
> Earth's water, then what is the source for the comets water?" So the
> logic makes the Comet theory
> look rather silly, afterall.
>
> So that Mumma should have realized that to answer how Earth got a hold
> of all of its water would likely answer
> how do comets get a hold of so much water that they are mostly
> composed of a flying ball of ice.
>
> So to answer how Earth got its water will likely be the answer as to
> how Comets get their water. That is
> the pretty thing about logic, it makes us think better and come up
> with better answers.
>
> So according to Mumma, the water in comets is about double the heavy
> water as found in the water on
> Earth.
>
> So let me place a jab of an answer as to how Comets and Earth gained
> their waters respectively.
>
> My theory of Solar System Water Gains: I use the Dirac Radioactivities
> theory for the creation of our
> Solar System, so if you are going to use the old stale and fake theory
> of Nebular Dust Cloud you will
> not understand much of anything. So Dirac envisioned that our Solar
> System started perhaps 10 billion
> years ago with seed-matter. Where the Sun and a number of planets were
> seeds of matter that weighed
> perhaps a milligram. And through Dirac Radioactivities (see his book
> "Directions in Physics") these seeds
> would collect more mass and matter by this radioactivity. Before too
> long the Sun some 10 billion years
> ago would be the size of a grapefruit and the planets the size of a
> BB. As the years went by they would
> grow by this radioactivity. We see it today in the flood of cosmic
> rays and gamma ray bursts that constantly
> impinge on the bodies in our solar system. Where is the source of the
> radioactivity? The nucleus of the
> Atom Totality itself. So given 10 billion years time we have our
> present day Solar System accreted from
> that radioactivity.
>
> Now how does Earth end up with so much water and where the Comets are
> mostly ice balls double the
> amount of heavy water? Well water is created by Dirac Radioactivities
> uniformily per existing mass. So
> most of the water created is in the Sun and Jupiter since they are the
> most massive but the water created
> in the Sun and Mercury, Venus, Mars and other planets does not stay
> put on those planets due to solar
> radiation and are driven off those bodies except for Earth where there
> is a Magnetosphere. So Earth is like
> a huge gutter of the water that was created on other astro bodies
> nearby and which ends up intersecting
> the orbit of Earth and the Magnetosphere keeps the water here.
>
> Now the Comet belt is another Gutter Effect, in that the Comet belt
> traps alot of this interplanetary and solar
> water. So why is it twice the amount of heavy water than the Earth's
> water? That is easy to answer with
> Dirac radioactivity which created the water in the first place and is
> adding more radioactive newly created
> mass to the already existing mass of the water molecules in the
> Cometary Belt. So as this water traverses
> past Earth and not trapped by Earth makes its long journey out to the
> Comet Belt where it is then reformed
> into huge ice balls and while it is making this reformulation, that
> the Dirac radioactivities has ample time
> to add on extra neutrons to the nucleus of the water atoms.
>
> Here is an experiment that some future scientists will perform when
> space travel is much easier than
> today. Where we take a mass of heavy element such as uranium and we
> refine it very pure
> so we know the nuclide composition to a very high precision and we
> subject this material to a long
> trek across the Solar System and wait for it to return. What we should
> find from this voyager is that
> some of the uranium atoms are now contaminated with atoms of
> plutonium. How could this be?
> Because in the journey the Dirac radioactivities created some extra
> neutrons on some atoms of uranium.
>
> So all I have to do for the above is find out more about the volume of
> space that the Comets dwell in
> and find out how that volume can act as a Gutter Effect of the water
> created in the inner solar system
> that gets pushed out into this Cometary belt. For Earth we already
> know how it acts as a gutter in that
> the Magnetosphere traps the incoming water.
>