The theory that solar radiation impelled water molecules from the Sun
to travel out to Saturn and become
part of the Saturn Ring, likewise the origin of the ice for Comets is
a good theory. As well as the oversupply
of water on Earth. Given the data, also that the rings of Saturn are
relatively new since not contaminated by
meteorite dusts. So this theory of water created in the Sun by Dirac
Radioactivities and then impelled motion
of that water outwards from the Sun by solar radiation is a good
theory for the spreading of water in our
Solar System.

So where is the theoretical problem?

It stems from my other theory of CellWell 1 and CellWell 2 where Sun
and inner planets is CellWell 1 and is
10 billion years old and Jupiter and gas giants is CellWell 2 and only
5 billion years old. The trouble here is
how to reconcile the Water Distribution theory with this CellWell
theory. If the Rings of Saturn is a classic
model of how gravity orders the mass around a planet, it should be the
model of how the planets around
a star look like. My trouble here is that the Sun to Mercury out to
Neptune fit the same model as the
Sun out to Mars.

So I may have the CellWell theory is a fake theory.

So I need some data, some evidence to support the CellWell theory and
which would kill the Nebular Dust Cloud
theory. Outright proving the Dirac Radioactivities, there is another
avenue of supporting the CellWell theory
and killing the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. That evidence is the data
of Binary Stars.

It used to be in the 1990s where alot of information can be gleaned
from Internet searches but these days
it seems as though only Wikipedia is available, and probably soon it
will be sold off to some commercial advertizing
barker.

--- quoting from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_stars

Formation

While it is not impossible that some binaries might be created through
gravitational capture between two
single stars, given the very low likelihood of such an event (three
objects are actually required, as
conservation of energy rules out a single gravitating body capturing
another) and the high number of
binaries, this cannot be the primary formation process. Also, the
observation of binaries consisting of
pre main sequence stars, supports the theory that binaries are already
formed during star formation.
Fragmentation of the molecular cloud during the formation of
protostars is an acceptable explanation for
the formation of a binary or multiple star system.[22][23]

The outcome of the three body problem, where the three stars are of
comparable mass, is that eventually
one of the three stars will be ejected from the system and, assuming
no significant further perturbations,
the remaining two will form a stable binary system.

--- end quoting ---

What I need to know is whether binary stars are relatively the same
age, and thus we can call them
Twin stars such as in biology that twins are of the same age.

Now on that website was mentioned that around 50%% of known stars are
in a binary formation. And the
key information I was looking for was whether any binary stars have
older pairs. Sirius A which is a
main sequence and Sirius B which is a white dwarf.

So, with that evidence that there are many binary stars where one star
is twice as old as its companion
indicates the fate and future formation of our own Solar System. That
Jupiter in CellWell2 is fated to be
a binary star to the Sun. Sun will become a white dwarf and Jupiter
will be the main sequence star.
Where Saturn, Uranus and Neptune will be swallowed up by Jupiter and
the inner planets will probably
be swallowed up. And the satellites of the Gas Giants such as
Ganymede, Titan, Europa, Io those will become
the new Mercury, new Venus, new Earth and new Mars.

So the evidence for both my theories is holding on. The evidence that
Saturn's Rings are relatively new
ice implies a Solar impelled motion of water from the Sun. The
evidence that most stars are binary
stars where one companion is twice as old as its other implies the
CellWell theory.

And of course, the creme delicious with cherry on top, is the data
that the Moon is separating from
Earth by more than 2 cm per year implies Dirac Radioactivities of
multiplicative creation of new matter
where there is existing matter. So where has the oversupply of water
for Earth come from? You guessed
it, the Sun creates new water and the solar radiation wavetrains it
out to Earth and our Magnetosphere
traps it.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies