|
|
Up |
  |
Author: Pentcho ValevPentcho Valev
Date: Jun 30, 2008 23:44
On Jul 1, 5:44 am, Tom Roberts sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> Establishing a new theoy of physics requires experiments. Ones that are
> consistent with the new theory and are inconsistent with the old theory.
The problem, Roberts Roberts, is that in Einstein zombie world the
experiments are consistent with the old theory and inconsistent with
the new theory. For instance, the gravitational frequency shift
f' = f(1+gh/c^2)
confirmed experimentally by Pound and Rebka, is consistent with both
Einstein's 1911 equation (in fact, old Newton's theory)
c' = c(1+gh/c^2)
showing how the speed of light varies with the gravitational
potential, and the equation
c' = c + v
given by Newton's emission theory of light (old theory) showing how
the speed of light varies with the speed of the light source. On the
other hand, the gravitational frequency shift f'=f(1+gh/c^2) is
inconsistent with equations of the type
c' = c
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Pentcho ValevPentcho Valev
Date: Jun 30, 2008 08:22
On Jun 29, 8:01 pm, Tom Roberts sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> [...]
>
> I'll answer the question in the subject: no.
>
> In relativity, "rigid" is impossible. But one could construct a "rod"
> out of a series of small atoms which are arranged in sequence along its
> length, and each atom is given an appropriate proper acceleration so at
> all times the proper distance between adjacent atoms is constant. This
> is as close as one can come to "rigid". When one does this for
> acceleration along the length of the rod, each atom along its length
> must be given a different proper acceleration. This is known as Born
> rigid motion.
>
> So there is no "the" proper acceleration of a "rigid" rod. There must be
> a different proper acceleration at each point along the...
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Pentcho ValevPentcho Valev
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:51
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/2515
"...he then goes on to propose the completely opposite hypothesis,
namely that "the energy of light is discontinuously distributed".
Einstein advocates this view partly because the wave theory seems to
lead to contradictions when applied to certain emission and absorption
phenomena (such as the photoelectric effect), but mainly because he is
dissatisfied with the "profound difference" that existed between the
discrete corpuscular description of matter and Maxwell's continuous-
field description of radiation."
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a09145525ca....
John Stachel: "It is not so well known that there was "another
Einstein," who from 1916 on was skeptical about the continuum as a
foundational element in physics..." Albert Einstein: "I consider it
entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept,
that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole
castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also
nothing of the rest of contemporary physics."
http://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768
"Relativity and Its Roots" by Banesh Hoffmann, Chapter 5.
(I do not have the text in English so I am giving it in French)
Banesh...
|
| Show full article (3.73Kb) |
|
10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Anonymous RemailerAnonymous Remailer
Date: Jun 29, 2008 12:51
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I sure enjoyed watching the George Carlin marathon on HBO
last week. Eleven uncensored comedy specials, listed here:
1) George Carlin at USC - 1977
2) George Carlin Again! - 1978
3) Carlin at Carnegie - 1983
4) Carlin on Campus - 1984
5) Playin' with Your Head - 1986
6) What Am I Doing in New Jersey? - 1988
7) Doin' It Again - 1990
8) Jammin' in New York - 1992
9) Back in Town - 1996
10) You Are All Diseased - 1999
11) It's Bad for Ya - 2008
I always loved Carlin, ever since his 'Class Clown' album
of 1972, with the famous Seven Words You Can Never Say on
Television, namely (politely misspelled) Chit, Piss, Fvck,
Cvnt, Cocksvcker, Motherfvcker, and Tits.
|
| Show full article (12.62Kb) |
|
10 Comments |
|
  |
Author: blues517blues517
Date: Jun 29, 2008 12:44
<
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/Miracle.jpg
<
Another passage from
"THE SECOND GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD"
<
(It should be noted that David Fellin had been subjected
to a pair of polygraph tests regarding his experiences out
of his body while entombed underground for 14 days
following a coal mine cave-in near Hazleton, Pa., in August
1963. He passed nptj wotj "no evidence of deception.")
<
========
<
Among David Fellin's most remarkable revelations were
journeys he insisted he had taken back in time which
had afforded him an opportunity to witness monumental
events of history as they actually occurred.
<
He testified, for example, that he had watched the ...
|
| Show full article (4.76Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: cestblucestblu
Date: Jun 29, 2008 01:56
Hi to All,
concerning the universe extension is it possible to assume that the
maximum distance between two points in the Universe is
3.14*13.7billion light years?
Explanation:
in the earth the max distance between 2 points (e.g. north pole and
south pole) is one half the ring, i.e. 3.14*r (r=earth ray). In the
universe speed material cannot exceed the light one, so the universe
cannot have an extension higher than it's age, always travelling to
it's maximum speed... the light one...
What do you think about that?
|
| |
|
24 Comments |
|
  |
Author: blues517blues517
Date: Jun 28, 2008 17:40
<
"UNLIMITED UNIVERSE FILLED WITH OTHER HUMAN LIFE"
<
> David Fellin's 1987 notarized letter (well before the Hubble)
"The size of the known universe. . . is as insignficant as a grain
of sand on the ocean floor in comparison to the size of the UNKNOWN
universe, which is out there in space but of which
we have no knowledge...
|
| Show full article (6.70Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Dirk Van de moortelDirk Van de moortel
Date: Jun 28, 2008 03:07
> Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
>
>
> Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
> of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
> firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,
> leading to a TOE. (Theory Of Everything)
The term "paradigm shift" is only used by marketing people.
The term "PARADIGM SHIFT" only used by bombastic
marketing people.
Dirk Vdm
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|