Mammalian fossils exposed on Carboniferous ground.
Fig. 1 below is labelled with numerous soft tissues fossilized and
exposed on the Carboniferous ground in Mahanoy city, Pennsylvania (see
google map in Fig. 2). Figure 1 was photographed many years ago and
appeared in the website www.edconrad.com
No one noticed the soft tissue fossil on the ground until I expanded
the photo by 400%%. Fig. 1 also contained a long fossil bone, evidenced
by Haversian canals labelled at the broken end of the fossil. Such a
bone could only belong to a mammal. No mammals in the Carboniferous
age?
Just when you think you've seen it all, I found a neo-fascist
oligarchy propaganda DVD in the mailbox today, from something
called "The Clarion Fund". So I popped it into the DVD player
and watched the...
Tell me again, who pays for the tab incurred by your deluded faith in
deregulation and the mythical "Invisible Hand of the Free Market"?
And is it love of country, or love of money, that you put first?
There is all kinds of stuff in motion in the Sol 112 Phoenix
micrographs. This is an indication of living material, lichen-like
material.
For example, a browser can be used to overlay register and then toggle
between the following three photos, all taken using a red light
source, and having slightly differing focus points. The above video
was provided as an easy substitute for this process. It shows
unmistakable motion of many objects, some flat or leaf-like, some
clumps rotating about on thin stalks:
There were large depositional basins from seas and oceans ranging from
hundreds of kilometers in length, tens of kilometers in width to more
than one hundred meters depth. Many clastic and non-clastic...
Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.
Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555128108&p=15
