Discovered: 21 organic cell/tissue remains on Mars in a single
substrate.

Fig. 1 below shows 21 obvious Martian cell/tissue remains in a single
substrate of the optical microscope on board Phoenix Mars Lander . The
photomicrograph was taken on Sol 101. The issue should now be settled
regarding whether or not there were cells on
Mars.

Fig. 1: Cell remains A to E had diameters ranging from 13 micrometers
to 20 micrometers. Cell remains F to L had diameters ranging from 13
micrometers to 21 micrometers. The remainders were tissue remains of
26 to 29 micrometers in diameter.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555314562&p=95

Source of Fig. 1:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/2835533347/

On Sep 13, 12:19 pm, "Y.Porat" gmail.com> wrote in
sci.physics:

Porat, you often claim that the photon is a particle with a mass. Then
its speed must depend on the speed of the light source mustn't it:

http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC
"Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann
p.92: "There are various remarks to be made about this second
principle. For instance, if it is so obvious, how...

"Anonymous Remailer" wrote in
message

(blah... blah..... blah................)

Not that I normally reply to such gibberish, but was it about Sarah Palin
that made you turn against the political system? An unusual twist here,
Danny. Up until recently you were always on the right.

On Sep 13, 2:10 am, Tom Roberts sbcglobal.net> wrote:

No Honest Roberts you are lying again. You agree that both the
Michelson-Morley and Pound-Rebka experiments are "FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE":

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/128cc9ce...?

Of course, elsewhere you claim that, even if "light in vacuum does not
travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform", special
relativity "would be unaffected".