sci.astro
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.astro only
 
Advanced search
September 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 36
891011121314 37
15161718192021 38
22232425262728 39
2930      40
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.astro Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Re: light inside a black hole         


Author: Golden California Girls
Date: Sep 14, 2008 20:39

RichD wrote:
> On Sep 13, Golden California Girls aol.com.mil> wrote:
>> RichD wrote:
>>> So every direction we look, we see the
>>> singularity...
>> No. Consider two observers who fall in close to each
>> other at the same time.
>> They can signal each other until they are torn apart.
>
>>> and in our universe, in every
>>> direction, we see the Big Bang... coincidence?
>> We are inside a black hole. Must be, if ther e was
>> a big bang. If everything was at a point the age
>> of the universe ago, then there was enough stuff in one
>> spot to make an event horizon. Now into what that
>> event horizon was can't be
>> known, except it isn't our x, y, z, time.
>>
>> Maybe a big bang is what happens when you get a
>> naked singularity? ...
Show full article (1.09Kb)
16 Comments
  Re: light inside a black hole         


Author: gb6724
Date: Sep 14, 2008 20:08

On Sep 14, 6:21 pm, RichD yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 13, Golden California Girls aol.com.mil> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> RichD wrote:
>>> So every direction we look, we see the
>>> singularity...
>
>> No.  Consider two observers who fall in close to each
>> other at the same time.
>> They can signal each other until they are torn apart.
>>> and in our universe, in every
>>> direction, we see the Big Bang... coincidence?
>
>> We are inside a black hole.  Must be, if ther e was
>> a big bang.  If everything was at a point the age
>> of the universe ago, then there was enough stuff in one ...
Show full article (1.28Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: light inside a black hole         


Author: gb6724
Date: Sep 14, 2008 19:57

On Sep 14, 6:08 pm, Edward Green netzero.com> wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2:37 pm, "gb6...@yahoo.com" yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>> Intuitively, one pictures the black hole
>>> like the interior of the earth, with the
>>> singularity at the center, the horizon as
>>> the surface.... I guess that doesn't work,
>>> it's some weird ass geometry...  can anyone
>>> visualize this?  Is there any 3-d co-ordinate
>>> system?
>
>>> So every direction we look, we see the
>>> singularity... and in our universe, in every
>>> direction, we see the Big Bang... coincidence?
>
>> The Universe has this strange feature that an event, ...
Show full article (4.78Kb)
3 Comments
  Discovered: 21 Martian organic cell/tissue remains in a single substrate.         


Author: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sep 13, 2008 05:36

Discovered: 21 organic cell/tissue remains on Mars in a single
substrate.

Fig. 1 below shows 21 obvious Martian cell/tissue remains in a single
substrate of the optical microscope on board Phoenix Mars Lander . The
photomicrograph was taken on Sol 101. The issue should now be settled
regarding whether or not there were cells on
Mars.

Fig. 1: Cell remains A to E had diameters ranging from 13 micrometers
to 20 micrometers. Cell remains F to L had diameters ranging from 13
micrometers to 21 micrometers. The remainders were tissue remains of
26 to 29 micrometers in diameter.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555314562&p=95

Source of Fig. 1:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/2835533347/
no comments
  Re: Einstein Dingleberries on the march!         


Author: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sep 13, 2008 03:37

On Sep 13, 12:19 pm, "Y.Porat" gmail.com> wrote in
sci.physics:
>> Porat 2 : is the speed of light in vacum constant ??
>> hanson : It depends.
>
> it depends on   nothing in vacum

Porat, you often claim that the photon is a particle with a mass. Then
its speed must depend on the speed of the light source mustn't it:

http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC
"Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann
p.92: "There are various remarks to be made about this second
principle. For instance, if it is so obvious, how...
Show full article (1.91Kb)
4 Comments
  Re: American = Stupid         


Author: Will Rolles
Date: Sep 13, 2008 01:20

"Anonymous Remailer" wrote in
message

(blah... blah..... blah................)
>
> Armageddon Cometh,
> Daniel Joseph Min
> http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/
> --
> I do not subscribe to usenet newsgroups. Reply
> via email,
>

Not that I normally reply to such gibberish, but was it about Sarah Palin
that made you turn against the political system? An unusual twist here,
Danny. Up until recently you were always on the right.
3 Comments
  Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity         


Author: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sep 13, 2008 00:12

On Sep 13, 2:10 am, Tom Roberts sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> John Kennaugh wrote:
>> there is a serious
>> alternative to relativity provided by more modern versions of Newton's
>> corpuscular theory namely Ritz's emission theory of 1908 and Waldron's
>> Ballistic theory of 1977. [...]  The
>> majority of experiments are consistent with both theories
>
> "The majority" does not matter. What matters is that NO experiment
> refutes the theory. That is true for SR (within its domain), but not for
> Ritz and not for Waldron AFAIK.

No Honest Roberts you are lying again. You agree that both the
Michelson-Morley and Pound-Rebka experiments are "FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE":

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/128cc9ce...?

Of course, elsewhere you claim that, even if "light in vacuum does not
travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform", special
relativity "would be unaffected".
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
  Re: видео Бритни и Кевина.         


Author: OscartheGrouch
Date: Sep 12, 2008 22:51

bumpkinka@gmail.com wrote:
> Смотри, как она сосет член, она лучшая! http://ragdai.info/golaya-pravda.htm
> Это видео супер!

So much for hoping for a Russian perspective on Leps.
1 Comment
  Re: Roll the bones!         


Author: Rick
Date: Sep 12, 2008 20:04

>
> I think it would work, and even at the energy levels of any of the
> other colliders out there.
>
> And thats an opportunity for a smaller one to steal some of their
> thunder.
> So the race is on.
>
> Now then knowing this, and knowing that there are other equipments out
> there which can do the same thing, the race is on.

http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/Cosmos/Footprints.html
This in no way proves anything about a big bang.

If anything, its universal smoothness proves there was no big bang.

What they should have been able to prove, if there was a big bang,
that it would be hotter towards a center.
Show full article (1.66Kb)
11 Comments
  Sky & Telescope's Weekly Bulletin - Sep 12         


Author: SJG
Date: Sep 12, 2008 19:47

======================================================
Sky & Telescope's Weekly Bulletin - September 12, 2008
======================================================

News
========================================
Hubble Finds a Mystery Object
----------------------------------------
September 11, 2008 | What was it? While monitoring a cluster of
galaxies, the Hubble Space Telescope recorded what seems like a new
class of astronomical object brightening and fading over six months.
Read More at: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/28244844.html

Eta Carinae: A Supermassive Showoff
----------------------------------------
September 12, 2008 | An enormous and famously erratic star in the
southern sky might have demonstrated a new kind of stellar explosion
during its dazzling eruption in the 1840s.
Read More at: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/28283519.html
Show full article (4.43Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5