http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/ Posts for sci.astro.research Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:05:32 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/stars_lie_with_enormous_disk_of_dark_matter_116937465t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/stars_lie_with_enormous_disk_of_dark_matter_116937465t.html fluff level ScienceNOW article from Science
Magazine, suggesting that there has now been found a
more detailed structure of the sphere of dark matter
within which a galaxy is embedded:

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/916/2?etoc

FYI

xanthian.

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:05:32 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/www_illusory_velocity_116891129t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/www_illusory_velocity_116891129t.html where I look at observational evidence. Two new pages

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/GalaxyRotationCurves

discusses the evidence for and against CDM and MOND, and compares to the
predictions of the teleconnection given in

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/QuantumCoordinates

The teleconnection does not require exotic CDM or a modification to
Newtonian gravity, but instead predicts that redshifts from astronomical
bodies need to be reinterpreted to take account of a term dependent on
cosmological expansion.

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:44:49 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/pioneer_116241145t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/pioneer_116241145t.html calculation showing it is predicted by the teleconnection.

I recently found two papers containing essentially the same calculation
(referenced on the webpage)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Pioneer

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:02:09 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/will_sirius_supernova_and_if_so_when_115659769t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/will_sirius_supernova_and_if_so_when_115659769t.html companion Sirius B is a white dwarf of about 1 solar masses. Once Sirius
A goes giant, it is possible that matter will be sucked into Sirius B.
If Sirius B thereby reaches the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 Solar masses,
it will supernova.

Can anyone estimate whether this process will actually take place, and
if so when? At nine light years, what would be the effect on Earth?



Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:00:44 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/grb_19_mar_2008_115635705t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/grb_19_mar_2008_115635705t.html but days,weeks, months later no published analysis
materialized, that I have found. Are the astronomers
still consolidating the data for peer publication?
Anyway what's the "fallout" ?
I quite interested in a "neutrino shock wave" that
occurred like SN1987a, but this burst, at a greater
distance, might produce a definite variation of the
neutrino speed to light speed.
Comments very welcome.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:50:10 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/www_supernova_fits_and_cosmological_parameters_115363065t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/www_supernova_fits_and_cosmological_parameters_115363065t.html predictions of relational quantum gravity with observation and with
those of standard cosmology. I have posted the results of the supernova
analysis, with graphs, and comparison of the properties of the models

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Supernova



Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

4 Comments

Reply

]]> Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:48:56 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/more_puzzles_for_cdm_114639609t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/more_puzzles_for_cdm_114639609t.html
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.3772v1.pdf

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:38:46 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/supernova_data_114282233t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/supernova_data_114282233t.html near SN (which should much improve the dataset) , while I wasn't looking

http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4142

They have a website where they intend to keep regular updates, and from
which the data can be downloaded.

http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union/



Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Posted In: sci.astro.research

6 Comments

Reply

]]> Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:18:51 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/bright_blue_1_4_pixel_sources_on_darker_3d_fractal_111062009t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/bright_blue_1_4_pixel_sources_on_darker_3d_fractal_111062009t.html visible light HUDF images: Rich Murray 2008.08.05
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.htm
Thursday, July 31, 2008
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/24
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/84


Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic
background fractal 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae:
Murray 2006.11.21
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/20

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/07/image/b/

http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2004/07/images/b/formats/full_tif.tif
7.34 MB tiff

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/
to access 62 deep sky astrophotos with texts

#33. Hubble Ultra Deep Field infrared view,
brightness +20, and both red and blue colors increased,
and green reduced, softness set to 3 of 12 levels, 4.07 MB png,
1600X1600 pixels. 4.07 MB png

The colors have been adjusted to reveal a few faint distant red
sources, as well as a background of tiny blue sources, 1-2 pixel size,
which are always on the background of dark tangled Murray mesh.
Click on All Sizes to view the Original.

static.flickr.com/42/121113050_6b7c705fcb_o.png

The number of the myriad minute blue sources varies noticeably,
for instance,from higher south of the bright foreground star,
just left of center at the bottom, to lower towards the lower right.
This indicates that simple surveys can collect much detailed
information. (Use the All Sizes button and select Original.)

The value of this simple approach is evident,
if we take the tiny blue sources to be
the earliest massive hypernovae and GRBs,
markers that highlight the 3D fractal network distribution of mostly H
gas filaments, condensing by gravitational attraction,
as the universe bubble continued its expansion.
It became cool enough at 380,000 years to allow atoms to form within
the former ionized plasma.
Transparency emerged from opacity.
The intense ultraviolet radiation at 3,000 deg K was redshifted and
cooled with the thousand-fold expansion of space-time to
comprise our era's Cosmic Microwave Background at just 2.7 deg K,
ubiquitious, and uniform to a few parts in a hundred thousand.

See for yourself, Observer,
the deep tapestry of our astrophysical history,
hung hugely against the uniform red background
downshifted cosmic ultraviolet),
the wooly open knit of cooled and condensed H filaments
(darkly silhouetting the background),
lit like Christmas trees with generations of tiny blue sources,
(the downshifted ultraviolet of immense fast-burning, short-lived
hypernovae,
and a few GRBs,
while some twin sources may be the two jet lobes of active galaxies),
with vistas of closer and cooler galaxies,
ranging from red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and white,
from early small clump cluster galaxies to far larger irregular,
spiral, and elliptical galaxies,
and the little kid in our own neighborhood,
the red foreground star with its diffraction spikes
from the Hubble Space Telescope,
just left of center at the bottom.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0807/0807.4928v1.pdf
Protostar Formation in the Early Universe, Naoki Yoshida,
Kazuyuki Omukai, Lars Hernquist, Science 2008.08.01 13p

http://www.physics.uci.edu/Cosmology/Yoshida_Naoki.pdf
>From the first stars to the first galaxies, Naoki H Yoshida,
27 slides show

http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/stars_c07/yoshida/
Second-Generation Star Formation in Proto-Galaxies, Naoki H Yoshida
2007.08.17 20 slides show

http://csaweb.yonsei.ac.kr/~sjyoon/JuniorSeminar/S_and_T/Stars_FirstStar_C2/014%%
5Bbromm%%5Ddark_ages_first_stars.pdf
Out of the Dark Ages the First Stars, Volker Bromm,
Sky & Telescope, 2006 May, 7 pages pdf

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080731-first-stars.html
Jeremy Hsu, www.space.com How the first stars were born 2008.07.31
____________________________________________________________

Posted In: sci.astro.research

no comments

Reply

]]> Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:11:36 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/null_physics_109291001t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.astro.research/null_physics_109291001t.html book, "Our Undiscovered Universe" subtitled "Introducing Null Physics". The
book has a web site at www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com.

I'm no physicist but from looking at that web site- the subject/concept
looks flakey. That's OK, there's plenty of flakey scientists and non
scientific concepts such as creationism- but they seldom have 2 page
advertisements in Scientific American- so, what's up with this "new"
physics? Does it have any respect in the scientific community?

Joe

Posted In: sci.astro.research

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:24:33 PDT