Participants here may enjoy reading this rather
fluff level ScienceNOW article from Science
Magazine, suggesting that there has now been found a
more detailed structure of the sphere of dark matter
within which a galaxy is embedded:

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/916/2?etoc

FYI

xanthian.

The theory is done and I am finally into the section of the website
where I look at observational evidence. Two new pages

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/GalaxyRotationCurves

discusses the evidence for and against CDM and MOND, and compares to the
predictions of the teleconnection given in

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/QuantumCoordinates

The teleconnection does not require exotic CDM or a modification to
Newtonian gravity, but instead predicts that redshifts from astronomical
bodies need to be reinterpreted to take account of a term dependent on
cosmological expansion.

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

I have added a short discussion of the Pioneer blueshift, and the
calculation showing it is predicted by the teleconnection.

I recently found two papers containing essentially the same calculation
(referenced on the webpage)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Pioneer

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

Sirius A is a main sequence star, of about 2 solar masses, and its
companion Sirius B is a white dwarf of about 1 solar masses. Once Sirius
A goes giant, it is possible that matter will be sucked into Sirius B.
If Sirius B thereby reaches the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 Solar masses,
it will supernova.

Can anyone estimate whether this process will actually take place, and
if so when? At nine light years, what would be the effect on Earth?

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

I read about the above Gamma Ray Burst,
but days,weeks, months later no published analysis
materialized, that I have found. Are the astronomers
still consolidating the data for peer publication?
Anyway what's the "fallout" ?
I quite interested in a "neutrino shock wave" that
occurred like SN1987a, but this burst, at a greater
distance, might produce a definite variation of the
neutrino speed to light speed.
Comments very welcome.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

I am on the final section of the website, in which I compare the
predictions of relational quantum gravity with observation and with
those of standard cosmology. I have posted the results of the supernova
analysis, with graphs, and comparison of the properties of the models

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Supernova

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

It seems as though smaller galaxy are more dominated by CDM.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.3772v1.pdf

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

There has been a new, and substantially larger compilation including new
near SN (which should much improve the dataset) , while I wasn't looking

http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4142

They have a website where they intend to keep regular updates, and from
which the data can be downloaded.

http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union/

Regards

--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

bright blue 1-4 pixel sources on darker 3D fractal web in IR and
visible light HUDF images: Rich Murray 2008.08.05
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.htm
Thursday, July 31, 2008
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/24
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/84

Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic
background fractal 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae:
Murray 2006.11.21
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/20

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/07/image/b/

http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2004/07/images/b/formats/full_tif.tif
7.34 MB tiff

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/
to access 62 deep sky astrophotos with texts

#33. Hubble Ultra Deep Field infrared view,
brightness +20, and both red and blue colors increased,
and green reduced, softness set to 3 of 12 levels, 4.07 MB png,
1600X1600 pixels. 4.07 MB png

Just noticed in the latest Scientific American a 2 page advertisement for a
book, "Our Undiscovered Universe" subtitled "Introducing Null Physics". The
book has a web site at www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com.

I'm no physicist but from looking at that web site- the subject/concept
looks flakey. That's OK, there's plenty of flakey scientists and non
scientific concepts such as creationism- but they seldom have 2 page
advertisements in Scientific American- so, what's up with this "new"
physics? Does it have any respect in the scientific community?

Joe