sci.astro.amateur
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.astro.amateur only
 
Advanced search
December 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 48
45678910 49
11121314151617 50
18192021222324 51
25262728293031 52
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
sci.astro.amateur Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

 Up
  Re: Orion XT8 Intelliscope         


Author: Don't Be Evil
Date: Dec 31, 2006 22:07

Walt wrote:
> Gazer wrote:
>> Don't Be Evil said
>>
>>> If you're not sure, you could get the Intelliscope without the
>>> computer. In addition to the option of adding the computer, this
>>> gets you a better finder and mount (knobs instead of springs).
>>
>> Can you elaborate on this. I assumed the Intelliscope version was simply
>> a classic version with encoders (and interface stuff). You are implying
>> the hardware is better with the Intelliscope?
>
> Yes. Check Orion's web site for specifics, but the Intelliscope comes
> with different hardware. A lot of it is to accomodate the encoders.
> And, the object locater (the handheld computer) is an extra $120, over
> and above the extra $110 or so for the Intelliscope.
>
> When I bought my XT-12 a few months ago I went ahead and bought the
> object locater.
> ...
Show full article (1.53Kb)
no comments
  Re: Am I reading this right -- moon occults Saturn morning of 10 December. tomorrow?         


Author: Brian Hughes
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:56

In article news3.newsguy.com>, "Joe S." mous.net>
wrote:
> In thinking about why Starry Night showed occultation -- SN shows the Moon
> as a large object -- it may be the software shows the Moon on screen larger
> than it is in the sky, thus, on the computer screen it would appear to
> occult Saturn.

You either were zoomed out too far or you had the Moon enlarged. There
is a setting for enlarging the Moon to make appear larger when zoomed
out. In SN Pro 6 you can right-click on the Moon and deselect "Enlarge
Moon Size"

--
Brian Hughes
temp0806 at hughesvideo dot com
no comments
  Do you keep a scope by a window?         


Author: Rich
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:51

A common site in movies, the proverbial small refractor mounted near a
window. This was probably more common when houses had big bay windows
out front than now that few do. People may remember a Questar ad
showing a Questar on a table near a window. Keeping a small scope
permanently mounted is also a way to avoid procrastination when it
comes to "Should I go out or not?" syndrome. A small apo, on a light
mount or tripod is certainly no struggle, even if someone is tired.
9 Comments
  Re: Rare Amateur Telescopes         


Author: William Hamblen
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:47

On 2007-01-01, Rich gmail.com> wrote:
>
> rpasken@eas.slu.edu wrote:
>> Rich wrote:
>>
>>> I beg to differ. Early equatorial mounts were tuning forks. No
>>> contact area to speak of,
>>> thin little shafts trying to hold up heavy OTAs. Because of poor
>>> design (like Cave) you need a very heavy mount to support any kind of
>>> scope. Today, a mount with a 20lb head can hold considerable weight,
>>> owing to better design.
>>
>> Tuning forks, you mean dobs correct? I owned a 12.5" Cave observatory
>> and used the 16" Cave at the Syracuse Astronomical Society's Darling
>> Hill observatory for years. Both are rock steady compared a 10" Orion
>> dob. As far as todays 20lb Head: You mean like an Celestron ASGT which
>> has a settling time of 5 seconds!
>
> Wow, you mean mounts with solid 2.5-4" shafts and weighing 150-250lbs
> are solid to a degree? Lets hope so. I had a Cave mounting, from a ...
Show full article (1.64Kb)
no comments
  Re: collimation questions         


Author: Astro Clubs for Jesus
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:44

everybody's way is the best -
Start with somebody's explanation that yous eem to be able to
follow and stick to that - dont change horses in the middle of
Niagra Falls.

Eric wrote:
> Can someone reccommend a good site that details each and every step of
> collimation from adjusting spider vanes, secondary tilt, sec up/down etc?
> Especially with some decent diagrams that show what...
Show full article (1.24Kb)
no comments
  Re: How did gas planets form? (question from my 13-year old son)         


Author: Astro Clubs for Jesus
Date: Dec 31, 2006 21:30

usenet@DavidFilmer.com wrote:
> I attempted to impart to my 13-year old son my limited knowledge of how
> planets form. I told him, basically, that solid planets were formed
> when solid matter (asteroids) coalesced by gravity, and gas planets
> were formed in like manner with gasses instead

and there you have it! Keep it simple. The kid aint going to Harvard
tomorrow?
no comments
  Re: collimation questions         


Author: Robert
Date: Dec 31, 2006 20:21

Eric wrote:
> Can someone reccommend a good site that details each and every step of
> collimation from adjusting spider vanes, secondary tilt, sec up/down etc?
no comments
  Dave Barry on Pluto         


Author: Mark Gingrich
Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:48

In his annual "Year in Review" feature, humorist Dave Barry duly notes
the imbroglio pertaining to the classification of Pluto:

The International Astronomical Union rules that Pluto will no
longer be classified as a major planet, on the grounds that it
is "less than half the size of James Gandolfini." A top U.S.
law firm immediately files a class-action lawsuit on behalf of
Pluto, as well as "anybody else who has been hurt by this ruling,
or has ever experienced neck pain."

Happy Besselian New Year, everybody!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Mark Gingrich grinch@rahul.net San Leandro, California
no comments
  Milky tea astronomer, stir teabag, mix atmospheres, storms in Jupiter, Saturn spokes.         


Author: don.lotto
Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:28

Milky tea astronomer, stir teabag, mix atmospheres, storms in Jupiter,
Saturn spokes.
Looks like Venus clouds. Video film.

Steep the teabag in boiling water, add ¼ milk. ????

Compare St-eve o-mea-ra sky telescope.
Observe white wall/ ceiling/ screen, 0.1 magnitude difference.
Practice train daily. 100^.02. ==. Luminosity brilliance.

...
Don.mcdonald Wellington new zealand. ( milk east ron...)

1-1-2007.
Sci.astro.amateur.

Stuff wrote>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Malaysia space programme stirs tempest in a teapot
Reuters | Tuesday, 19 December 2006
Email a Friend | Printable View | Have Your Say
Related Links
· Subscribe to Archivestuff
· Have your say
KUALA LUMPUR...
Show full article (2.16Kb)
no comments
  Re: Celestron Advanced GT/Nexstar RS-232?         


Author: William Hamblen
Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:24

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:39:40 -0800, Robert Sheaffer
debunker.com> wrote:
>Not all PC serial ports are made equal. When not in use, most serial
>ports idle with a stop bit. However, some serial ports send a
>continuous start bit (break signal) when not in use. If the HC serial
>port receives a continuous start bit, it gets confused or bogged down
>and has difficulties sending characters the next time you connect.

The standard for serial ports is to mark time while idle, otherwise
you don't know a start bit has arrived. Sending a break all the time
is bad behavior. A break is supposed to be sent only to get the
attention of the other end of the line.

Bud
--
The night is just the shadow of the Earth.
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9