|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Jun 14, 2008 18:09
|
| |
|
| | 47 Comments |
|
|
Author: Peace CrusaderPeace Crusader Date: Jun 15, 2008 07:30
Dear David and my Fellowmen,
On Jun 15, 11:09 am, David yahoo.com> wrote:
The Holy Spirit revealed that Jesus was born on the night of May 23.
I learned about this revelation in 1983 from earlier listeners of the
Holy Spirit. In 2004, that’s more than 20 years since I first heard
it, I checked if it is true. After two years, I found it to be
correct. The year was 33 BC. Jesus was 32 solar years old when He
died. This is equivalent to 33 lunar years. The results of my study
can be found at http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/birthmay23.htm.
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Jun 15, 2008 12:30
On Jun 15, 10:30Â am, Peace Crusader hotmail.com> wrote:> Dear David and my Fellowmen,
>
> On Jun 15, 11:09 am, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>
>> "When Humbert and Chambon's 'Fouilles de Khirbet
>> Qumran et de Ain Feshkha' was published in 1994,
>> I saw from the diagrams and photoes on pp. 268-272
>> that there had actually been remains of two buildings."
>
>> David Christainsen
>
> The Holy Spirit revealed that Jesus was born on the night of May 23.
> I learned about this revelation in 1983 from earlier listeners of the
> Holy Spirit.  In 2004, that’s more than 20 years since I first heard
> it, I checked if it is true. Â After two years, I found it to be ...
|
| Show full article (2.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 15, 2008 12:39
David wrote, 15/06/2008 21:30:
> On Jun 15, 10:30 am, Peace Crusader hotmail.com> wrote:>> Dear David and my Fellowmen,
>>
>> On Jun 15, 11:09 am, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> The Holy Spirit revealed that Jesus was born on the night of May 23.
>> I learned about this revelation in 1983 from earlier listeners of the
>> Holy Spirit. In 2004, that’s more than 20 years since I first heard
>> it, I checked if it is true. After two years, I found it to be
>> correct. The year was 33 BC. Jesus was 32 solar years old when He
>> died. This is equivalent to 33 lunar years. The results of my study
>> can be found athttp://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/birthmay23.htm. ...
|
| Show full article (2.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Jun 15, 2008 13:14
On Jun 15, 3:39Â pm, Peter Alaca wrote:> David wrote, 15/06/2008 21:30:
>...
>> P.S.
>> BTW Peter Alaca is a total jerk for mouthing off
>> that I am a "stupid troll". Â Hopefully, anybody who
>> was paying attention to his boring non-stop sniping
>> knows that Peter was using the non-face-to-face
>> Internet in his immature, rude, and non-productive way.
>
> Piss off, troll.
> The bible has nothing to do with archaeology.
I can always count on you to respond to me but
you never learn in the slightest from my constructive
criticism of you. I was being blunt and to the point.
Besides, it felt very good.
---
Next, I want to deal with whatever intellectual content
your ignorant remark has.
|
| Show full article (1.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 15, 2008 15:49
David wrote, 15/06/2008 22:14:
> On Jun 15, 3:39 pm, Peter Alaca wrote:>> David wrote, 15/06/2008 21:30:
>> ...
>>> P.S.
>>> BTW Peter Alaca is a total jerk for mouthing off
>>> that I am a "stupid troll". Hopefully, anybody who
>>> was paying attention to his boring non-stop sniping
>>> knows that Peter was using the non-face-to-face
>>> Internet in his immature, rude, and non-productive way.
>> Piss off, troll.
>> The bible has nothing to do with archaeology.
> I can always count on you to respond to me
Yes, that is why you are a troll
> but
> you never learn in the slightest from my constructive
> criticism of you. I was being blunt and to the point.
Blunt /and/ to the point?
> Besides, it felt very good.
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Jun 15, 2008 18:37
On Jun 15, 6:49Â pm, Peter Alaca wrote:>...
> Yes, that is why you are a troll
No, you are quite mistaken in your judgment of me
and some other people as well.
However, you have made good contributions on archaeology
and are well respected by solid sci.archers.
>
>> but
>> you never learn in the slightest from my constructive
>> criticism of you. Â I was being blunt and to the point.
>
> Blunt /and/ to the point?
Eric has told you before not to play stupid.
>> Besides, it felt very good.
>
> I am not interested
You are boring.
---
|
| Show full article (0.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Martin EdwardsMartin Edwards Date: Jun 15, 2008 23:48
Peter Alaca wrote:
> David wrote, 15/06/2008 21:30:
>> On Jun 15, 10:30 am, Peace Crusader hotmail.com> wrote:>>> Dear David and my Fellowmen,
>>>
>>> On Jun 15, 11:09 am, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Holy Spirit revealed that Jesus was born on the night of May 23.
>>> I learned about this revelation in 1983 from earlier listeners of the
>>> Holy Spirit. In 2004, that’s more than 20 years since I first heard
>>> it, I checked if it is true. After two years, I found it to be
>>> correct. The year was 33 BC. Jesus was 32 solar years old when He ...
|
| Show full article (2.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kendall DownKendall Down Date: Jun 16, 2008 00:18
David wrote:
> Dr. Thiering is a scholar with an international reputation.
True - but it's not a reputation I would care to have.
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Jun 16, 2008 01:27
On Jun 16, 3:18Â am, Kendall Down spam.co.uk> wrote:> David wrote:
>> Dr. Thiering is a scholar with an international reputation.
>
> True - but it's not a reputation I would care to have.
>...
Yes, a worldwide beating, disdain, or complete neglect is
basically the reaction her career drew among scholars.
However, I invite you to look deeper at her situation, at the
other side of the story -
She continued to get published for decades for work at
a very high level of technical quality.
Her methodology (pesher) was never PEER REVIEWED even once
over decades; I specifically mean the heart of the matter, not
some side speciality of Qumran Studies, archaeology, conventional
ancient history. Her evidence as a total package from the Scrolls,
the New Testament, and early Christian literature (apocryphal,
gnostic, and patristic) WAS ALSO NEVER CONSIDERED.
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
