|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Sep 25, 2007 01:12
David wrote:
> Furthermore, you know very well that once upon a time I actually
> thought I could teach Thiering pesher to Engineer.
>
> I was wrong, very wrong. Â I'll never make that mistake again.
You were indeed, as you cannot read the primary source material in its
original language and orthography, you are totally unable to 'teach'
Thiering pesher to any one, other than as a a 'revealed truth'.
--
John
"Who is John Galt"
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Sep 25, 2007 08:40
On Sep 25, 2:47 am, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:> On 25 Sep, 00:26, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Also, a Christian acolyte by definition reads/studies the sources
>> including that BRILLIANT 1981 Thiering paper.
>
> Who has assessed that paper as "brilliant" (or even "BRILLIANT")? What
> are their qualifications for making that assessment?
>
> Ian
I will state the obvious.
If Ian really wants to know the answer to his question, Ian should get
the paper from Yowie and judge for himself whether it is brilliant and
then get back to us.
BTW, I meant to write Christainsen acolyte, not Christian acolyte.
Regards,
Dave
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: IanIan Date: Sep 25, 2007 10:01
On 25 Sep, 16:40, David yahoo.com> wrote:> On Sep 25, 2:47 am, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:>> Who has assessed that paper as "brilliant" (or even "BRILLIANT")? What
>> are their qualifications for making that assessment?
> If Ian really wants to know the answer to his question, Ian should get
> the paper from Yowie and judge for himself whether it is brilliant and
> then get back to us.
I'm an academic engineer. What makes you think I'm qualified to judge
whether a paper on church history is brilliant or not?
Are you saying that you believe me to be fully competent to assess
Thiering's work?
Ian
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Sep 26, 2007 08:10
On Sep 25, 1:01 pm, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:> On 25 Sep, 16:40, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 2:47 am, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:>>> Who has assessed that paper as "brilliant" (or even "BRILLIANT")? What
>>> are their qualifications for making that assessment?
>> If Ian really wants to know the answer to his question, Ian should get
>> the paper from Yowie and judge for himself whether it is brilliant and
>> then get back to us.
>
> I'm an academic engineer. What makes you think I'm qualified to judge
> whether a paper on church history is brilliant or not?
>
> Are you saying that you believe me to be fully competent to assess
> Thiering's work?
>
> Ian
You have not even followed the flow of conversation enough to know
that the 1981 Thiering paper has nothing to do with church history.
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
