|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Sep 23, 2007 16:14
"Engineer" wrote...
>
>
>
> David wrote:
>
>>Why would Engineer fire away on the NGs before studying Dr.
>>Thiering's books and her brilliant, scholarly articles?
>
> I don't, as a rule, respond to obvious attempts to flood
> soc.religion.quaker with posts from sci.archaeology users.
clarification: carl of david is not a sci.archaeology user, (abuser maybe,
hater definately).
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: EngineerEngineer Date: Sep 23, 2007 18:17
Tedd Jacobs wrote:
>
>"Engineer" wrote...
>>
>> David wrote:
>>
>>>Why would Engineer fire away on the NGs before studying Dr.
>>>Thiering's books and her brilliant, scholarly articles?
>>
>> I don't, as a rule, respond to obvious attempts to flood
>> soc.religion.quaker with posts from sci.archaeology users.
>
>clarification: carl of david is not a sci.archaeology user, (abuser maybe,
>hater definately).
Agreed. It's the other folks who *are* sci.archaeology users that he
is trying (and failing) to get to flood the Quaker newsgroup.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Doug WellerDoug Weller Date: Sep 23, 2007 23:35
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:16:31 -0000, in sci.archaeology, Tom McDonald
wrote:
>On Sep 23, 5:01 pm, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:>> On 23 Sep, 22:38, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> The nails went thru Jesus's palms, not wrists. The Thiering
>>> explanation...
|
| Show full article (2.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JohnJohn Date: Sep 24, 2007 06:48
Ian wrote:
> Do you understand it completely?
How can he, he can't read the original source material in its original
language and orthography.
--
John
"Who is John Galt"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tom McDonaldTom McDonald Date: Sep 24, 2007 15:55
On Sep 24, 3:10 pm, David yahoo.com> wrote:
> After having taken the Internet beating that I have, I don't feel
> like digging for
> specific backup and handing it to you on a silver platter.
A new excuse for not doing backing up what you write.
Lazy and/or incompetent? Probably.
>> By the time of Christ, the Romans had a lot of experience crucifying
>> folk. Caesar's pay-back of the pirates who'd captured him (albeit he
>> did show some mercy there), and the fighters in the...
|
| Show full article (3.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DavidDavid Date: Sep 24, 2007 16:26
On Sep 24, 6:55 pm, Tom McDonald gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 24, 3:10 pm, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> After having taken the Internet beating that I have, I don't feel
>> like digging for
>> specific backup and handing it to you on a silver platter.
>
> A new excuse for not doing backing up what you write.
It is not an excuse. If somebody pays me, then I might do it.
> Lazy and/or incompetent? Probably.
Studious, intelligent, ethical, and honest.
>>> By the time of Christ, the Romans had a lot of experience crucifying
>>> folk. Caesar's pay-back of the pirates who'd captured him (albeit he
>>> did show some mercy there), and the fighters...
|
| Show full article (4.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 24, 2007 22:51
[s.r.q removed, again]
"David" wrote...
> On Sep 24, 6:55 pm, Tom McDonald gmail.com> wrote:>> On Sep 24, 3:10 pm, David yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> After having taken the Internet beating that I have, I don't feel
>>> like digging for
>>> specific backup and handing it to you on a silver platter.
>>
>> A new excuse for not doing backing up what you write.
>
> It is not an excuse. If somebody pays me, then I might do it.
oh yes, i fully agree... we should do research and provide the results
*only* if we get paid... its the 'ethical' thing to do.
|
| Show full article (0.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: IanIan Date: Sep 24, 2007 23:45
On 24 Sep, 21:54, David yahoo.com> wrote:> On Sep 24, 4:19 pm, Ian btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>...
>> You didn't have the integrity to give Yowie an honest answer - despite
>> having publically promised to do so.
>>...
>
> I will not do Thiering pesher detail on the Internet. This is my
> policy.
Why not?
Anyway, Yowie did not ask you to do Thiering pesher. She asked you to
clarify some points arising from the alternative history which
Thiering pesher claims to reveal.
> If Ian genuinely wants the answers, do your own work and stop
> broadcasting to the Internet NG world that David Christainsen
> is a promise-breaker or that honor is even involved.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: IanIan Date: Sep 24, 2007 23:47
On 25 Sep, 00:26, David yahoo.com> wrote:
> Also, a Christian acolyte by definition reads/studies the sources
> including that BRILLIANT 1981 Thiering paper.
Who has assessed that paper as "brilliant" (or even "BRILLIANT")? What
are their qualifications for making that assessment?
Ian
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: JohnJohn Date: Sep 25, 2007 01:08
David wrote:
> I don't accept it uncritically; rather, I explain Thiering.
That is exactly the problem, you don't 'explain Thiering', you simply assert
that Thiering is correct and any other explanation wrong.
--
John
"Who is John Galt"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
