|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: michaelruggerimichaelruggeri Date: May 31, 2008 18:53
|
| |
|
| | 48 Comments |
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 1, 2008 01:11
michaelruggeri@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53: > Listeros,
>
> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>
> Science News has the story and a photo here;
> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32728/title/Footprints_in_the_ash
>
> and a tiny URL;
> http://tinyurl.com/44pszl
>
> Needless to say, this will generate plenty of controversy,
I don't understand how a laserscan can confirm that
it is human. And to me the result of the scan looks
less like a footprint than the original.
|
| Show full article (0.72Kb) |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 1, 2008 04:36
Eric Stevens wrote, 01/06/2008 12:05:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:11:41 +0200, Peter Alaca
> wrote:
> >> michaelruggeri@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53: >>> Listeros,
>>>
>>> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
>>> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
>>> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
>>> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>>>
>>> Science News has the story and a photo here;
>>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32728/title/Footprints_in_the_ash
>>>
>>> and a tiny URL;
>>> http://tinyurl.com/44pszl
>>>
>>> Needless to say, this will generate plenty of controversy
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jack LinthicumJack Linthicum Date: Jun 1, 2008 04:50
On Jun 1, 7:36 am, Peter Alaca wrote:> Eric Stevens wrote, 01/06/2008 12:05:
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:11:41 +0200, Peter Alaca
>> wrote:>
>>> michaelrugg...@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53: >>>> Listeros,
>
>>>> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
>>>> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
>>>> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
>>>> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>
>
>>>> and a tiny URL; ...
|
| Show full article (2.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 1, 2008 05:04
Jack Linthicum wrote, 01/06/2008 13:50:
> Peter Alaca wrote:
>> Eric Stevens wrote,
>>> Peter Alaca wrote:
>>>>> Listeros,
>>>>> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
>>>>> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
>>>>> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
>>>>> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>>>>> Science News has the story and a photo here;
>>>>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32728/title/Footprints_in_...
>>>>> and a tiny URL;
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/44pszl
>>>>> Needless to say, this will generate plenty of controversy >>>> I don't understand how a laserscan can confirm that
>>>> it is human. And to me the result of the scan looks
>>>> less like a footprint than the original.
|
| Show full article (1.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jack LinthicumJack Linthicum Date: Jun 1, 2008 05:13
On Jun 1, 8:04 am, Peter Alaca wrote:> Jack Linthicum wrote, 01/06/2008 13:50:
>
>
>
>> Peter Alaca wrote:
>>> Eric Stevens wrote,
>>>> Peter Alaca wrote:
>>>>> michaelrugg...@ mac.com wrote, >>>>>> Listeros,
>>>>>> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
>>>>>> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
>>>>>> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
>>>>>> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>>>>>> Science News has the story and a photo here;
>>>>>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32728/title/Footprints_in_...
>>>>>> and a tiny URL;
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/44pszl
>>>>>> Needless to say, this will generate plenty of controversy >>>>> I don't understand how a laserscan can confirm that ...
|
| Show full article (1.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Uwe MüllerUwe Müller Date: Jun 1, 2008 08:24
"Peter Alaca" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:484289bc$0$90305$dbd43001@news.wanadoo.nl...> Eric Stevens wrote, 01/06/2008 12:05:
>> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:11:41 +0200, Peter Alaca
>> wrote:
>>>>> michaelruggeri@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53:
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter AlacaPeter Alaca Date: Jun 1, 2008 08:52
Uwe Müller wrote, 01/06/2008 17:24:
> "Peter Alaca" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:484289bc$0$90305$dbd43001@news.wanadoo.nl...>> Eric Stevens wrote, 01/06/2008 12:05:
>>> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:11:41 +0200, Peter Alaca
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> michaelruggeri@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53:
|
| Show full article (1.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Tom McDonaldTom McDonald Date: Jun 1, 2008 12:28
Peter Alaca wrote:
> michaelruggeri@ mac.com wrote, 01/06/2008 03:53: >> Listeros,
>>
>> The claimed 40,000 year old human footprints found in Mexico a few
>> years back have been resurrected. In Science News, it is reported at
>> the American Geophysical Union meeting that 3 dimensional laser scans
>> of the prints confirm their human origins.
>>
>> Science News has the story and a photo here;
>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32728/title/Footprints_in_the_ash
>>
>>
>> and a tiny URL;
>> http://tinyurl.com/44pszl
>>
>> Needless to say, this will generate plenty of controversy, >
> I don't understand how a laserscan can confirm that
> it is human. And to me the result of the scan looks ...
|
| Show full article (5.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
