insects evolution
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.antropology.paleo only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.antropology.paleo Profile…
 Up
insects evolution         


Author: whizbang
Date: Mar 26, 2008 18:47

“There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
25 Comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: David V.
Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:13

whizbang wrote:
>
> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.

Liar.
--
Dave

You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents,
not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: James Beck
Date: Mar 27, 2008 09:01

In article sti.net>, spam@hotmail.com
says...
> whizbang wrote:
>>
>> =3FThere are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>> insects looked like.=3F=3FLife Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>
> Liar.
>
Ranks right up there with the "there are no transitional form fossils"
and the like. Out right lies, but that is what they believe. Willful
ignorance isn't even the case, more like willful denial.
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: SeppoP
Date: Mar 27, 2008 09:22

David V. wrote:
> whizbang wrote:
>>
>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>
> Liar.

Well, what would you expect from Jabby?
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: David V.
Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:44

James Beck wrote:
> In article, spam@hotmail.com says...
>
>> whizbang wrote:
>>
>>> =3FThere are no fossils known that show what the primitive
>>> ancestral insects looked like.=3F=3FLife Nature Library,
>>> The Insects, page 14.
>>
>> Liar.
>
> Ranks right up there with the "there are no transitional form
> fossils" and the like. Out right lies, but that is what they
> believe. Willful ignorance isn't even the case, more like
> willful denial.

And they are so proud of their ignorance they proclaim it loudly
from the mountain tops. They're sick people.
--
Dave
Show full article (0.72Kb)
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: David V.
Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:45

SeppoP wrote:
> David V. wrote:
>
>> whizbang wrote:
>>
>>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive
>>> ancestral insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The
>>> Insects, page 14.
>>
>> Liar.
>
> Well, what would you expect from Jabby?

Lies.
--
Dave

You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents,
not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: FeezeSpray
Date: Mar 27, 2008 16:34

David V. wrote:
> whizbang wrote:
>>
>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>
> Liar.

Life Nature Library is a lie?
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: David V.
Date: Mar 27, 2008 19:10

FeezeSpray wrote:
> David V. wrote:
>
>> whizbang wrote:
>>>
>>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>>> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>>
>> Liar.
>
> Life Nature Library is a lie?

That part of it as interpreted by a brain dead creationist, yes.
--
Dave

You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents,
not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: Solor
Date: Mar 28, 2008 02:39

David V. wrote:
> FeezeSpray wrote:
>> David V. wrote:
>>
>>> whizbang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>>>> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> Life Nature Library is a lie?
>
> That part of it as interpreted by a brain dead creationist, yes.

A science journal is a lie. thanks for pointing that out.
no comments
Re: insects evolution         


Author: Free Lunch
Date: Mar 28, 2008 03:37

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:39:14 GMT, in alt.talk.creationism
Solor d.org> wrote in <613Hj.5189$VK4.3322@trnddc08>:
>David V. wrote:
>> FeezeSpray wrote:
>>> David V. wrote:
>>>
>>>> whizbang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> “There are no fossils known that show what the primitive ancestral
>>>>> insects looked like.”—Life Nature Library, The Insects, page 14.
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> Life Nature Library is a lie?
>>
>> That part of it as interpreted by a brain dead creationist, yes.
>
>A science journal is a lie. thanks for pointing that out.

Life Nature Library is hardly a science journal.
no comments
1 2 3