|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Mar 30, 2008 06:32
"The cute, feel-good images of babies swimming freely in a pool, shown
in
the AAT video, have nothing to do with the real situation of predator
avoidance
in Africa. Ask the Dasenich or Turkana people who live around Lake
Turkana:
only visiting maniacs swim in that lake." Cameron Smith
http://tinyurl.com/y44rnt
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
|
| | 60 Comments |
|
|
Author: Marc VerhaegenMarc Verhaegen Date: Mar 30, 2008 14:10
The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
- hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
bones etc.
- hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
- some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places
This is *all* the savanna believers have!
From this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African savanna!
:-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Mar 30, 2008 16:28
On Mar 30, 2:10Â pm, Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
|
| Show full article (2.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: rmacfarlrmacfarl Date: Mar 30, 2008 19:48
On Mar 31, 7:10Â am, Marc Verhaegen wrote:
> The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
>
> - hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
> bones etc.
>
> - hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
>
> - some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places
>
> This is *all* the savanna believers have!
> From this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African savanna!
>
> :-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
A glass half full for the aquatic adherents:
I have said it before, and I will say it again: the best argument I've
yet seen for why the AAH must be wrong is the quality of the arguments
made by those who believe it is right.
Ross Macfarlane
|
| |
| 7 Comments |
|
|
Author: spiznetspiznet Date: Mar 30, 2008 20:30
On Mar 30, 10:48Â pm, rmacfarl alphalink.com.au> wrote:> On Mar 31, 7:10Â am, Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
>> The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
>
>> - hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
>> bones etc.
>
>> - hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
>
>> - some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places
>
>> This is *all* the savanna believers have!
>> From this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African savanna!
>
>> :-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>
> A glass half full for the aquatic adherents:
>
> I have said it before, and I will say it again: the best argument I've ...
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Claudius DenkClaudius Denk Date: Mar 30, 2008 20:48
"rmacfarl" alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
news:26e22561-a1b6-4aa8-a11c-4abae21c8183@y24g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 31, 7:10 am, Marc Verhaegen wrote:> The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
>
> - hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
> bones etc.
>
> - hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
>
> - some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places
>
> This is *all* the savanna believers have!
> From this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African savanna!
>
> :-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
A glass half full for the aquatic adherents:
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Mar 30, 2008 21:42
On Mar 30, 8:48Â pm, "Claudius Denk" sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>
> That's not much of an argument.
Says the loon who squeaks:
1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and guns.
2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats.
3 Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree.
4 Climate...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Marc VerhaegenMarc Verhaegen Date: Mar 31, 2008 15:22
>> The only arguments I could find so far pro the savanna idea are these:
>> - hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
>> bones etc.
>> - hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
>> - some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places
>> This is *all* the savanna believers have!
>> From this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African savanna!
>> :-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
The only thing the Savanna Fools could answer:
> A glass half full for the aquatic adherents:
> I have said it before, and I will say it again: the best argument I've
> yet seen for why the AAH must be wrong is the quality of the arguments
> made by those who believe it is right.
> Ross Macfarlane
:-DDDDDDDDDDDD
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Mar 31, 2008 15:55
On Mar 31, 3:22Â pm, Marc Verhaegen
needed some citations from the professionals.
Glad to help out:
Relationship among running mileage, bone density, and serum
testosterone in male runners
J. D. MacDougall, C. E. Webber, J. Martin, S. Ormerod, A. Chesley, E.
V. Younglai, C. L. Gordon and C. J. Blimkie...
|
| Show full article (3.76Kb) |
| 10 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Marc VerhaegenMarc Verhaegen Date: Mar 31, 2008 17:47
The only "arguments" I've seen so far pro the savanna idea are these:
- hominid remains have been found with traces of stone butchering on bovid
bones etc.
- hominid remains have been found next to ostrich egg shells etc.
- some humans today run down bovids in hot dry places.
This is *all* the savanna believers have!
And from this they conclude that human ancestors lived in the African
savanna!
Op 01-04-2008 00:55, in artikel
4b8999b7-a6d0-43d9-a1f4-11e5c1c83d90@ s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
hotmail.com> schreef:
needed some citations from the professionals:
> Relationship among running mileage, bone density, and serum
> testosterone in male runners
Yes, totally unlike pachyostosis in H.erectus.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
