Please don't go in the water after your sedges (was Re: tigre & ape)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
sci.anthropology.paleo only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

sci.anthropology.paleo Profile…
 Up
Re: Hunting in dangerous water         


Author: Lee Olsen
Date: Apr 27, 2008 19:37

On Apr 27, 7:13 pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> No response?

You got a response, what part "you are an illiterate" are you to
stupid to understand?

Message-ID: <376ED09C.69A21...@thegrid.net>#1/1
Niccolo Caldararo: " It is embarrassing to you (or should be) for you
to continually make
statements which most of us know are unsupported by the data."

Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best thing
you can do is do
substantial background reading, reframe your arguement and come back
again."

Greg Laden: "Read the stuff. If you have a vague memory
of it, that is not good enough." "Hit the books, kid!"
Show full article (1.14Kb)
no comments
Re: Hunting in dangerous water         


Author: Lee Olsen
Date: Apr 27, 2008 19:43

Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> My hypothesis....

You don't have a hypothesis. What you have is a manifesto based on
your
illiteracy of the literature:

1. Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and guns.
2. Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats.
3. Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree.
4. Climate change is not happening...
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
Re: Hunting in dangerous water         


Author: Lee Olsen
Date: Apr 27, 2008 19:44

On Apr 27, 7:23 pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Let us know how this works out

Badly for you I'm afraid:

1. Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and guns.
2. Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats.
3. Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree.
4. Climate change is not happening...
Show full article (1.10Kb)
no comments
Re: Please don't go in the water after your sedges (was Re: tigre & ape)         


Author: Rich Travsky
Date: May 11, 2008 21:33

Lee Olsen wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 11:58 am, Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C94toea8KqU
>>
>> Thanks, Mario.
>>
>> --Marc

Deer and tigers are aquatic.
no comments
Deer and tigers are aquatic says Savanna Fool.         


Author: Marc Verhaegen
Date: May 12, 2008 04:12

SF:
> Deer and tigers are aquatic.

Typical empty talk of people who have nothing to say.
Tigers are *more aquatic* than, eg, lions: camouflage for reedbeds etc.,
larger, broader paws, spend some time in water etc.
no comments
Re: mountain beavers are semi-aquatic says wetloon fool         


Author: Lee Olsen
Date: May 12, 2008 07:53

Marc Verhaegen wrote:

TREE 2002 Page 213-14:
"... capybaras Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris and
mountain-beavers Aplodontia rufa [24]. Both these
semi-aquatic rodents feed mainly on riverside herbs,
grasses and the bark of young trees."
no comments
Re: mountain beavers are semi-aquatic says wetloon fool         


Author: rmacfarl
Date: May 15, 2008 21:03

On May 13, 12:53 am, Lee Olsen hotmail.com> wrote:
>  Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
> TREE 2002 Page 213-14:
> "... capybaras Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris and
> mountain-beavers Aplodontia rufa [24]. Both these
> semi-aquatic rodents feed mainly on riverside herbs,
> grasses and the bark of young trees."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_beaver
The Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa) is a primitive rodent *unrelated
to beavers* and not always found in mountainous areas.
no comments
Re: mountain beavers are semi-aquatic says wetloon fool         


Author: Lee Olsen
Date: May 15, 2008 22:03

On May 15, 9:03 pm, rmacfarl alphalink.com.au> wrote:
> On May 13, 12:53 am, Lee Olsen hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Marc Verhaegen wrote:
>
>> TREE 2002 Page 213-14:
>> "... capybaras Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris and
>> mountain-beavers Aplodontia rufa [24]. Both these
>> semi-aquatic rodents feed mainly on riverside herbs,
>> grasses and the bark of young trees."
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_beaver
> The Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa) is a primitive rodent *unrelated
> to beavers* and not always found in mountainous areas.

Yep, just goes to show Wiki is a better source of info than Verhaegen
and his TREE paper.
no comments
Savanna Fiction (Re: mountain beavers are semi-aquatic says wetloon fool         


Author: Marc Verhaegen
Date: May 15, 2008 23:33

The Savanna Fantasists don't even realise that it's irrelevant whether
beavers & mountain beavers are related:
Mountain beavers eat succulent food. Their enamel microwear resembles that
of Lucy (P-F.Puech). But our ridiculous savanna believers keep think that
Lucy ran after kudus.
No doubt: SFs are stupid stupid stupid:

Op 16-05-2008 07:03, in artikel
87a4e9e0-90eb-4877-93f3-07f5ffe737e1@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
hotmail.com> schreef:
Show full article (1.18Kb)
no comments
Savanna Fool (Re: mountain beavers are semi-aquatic says wetloon fool         


Author: Marc Verhaegen
Date: May 15, 2008 23:34

>> TREE 2002 Page 213-14:
>> "... capybaras Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris and
>> mountain-beavers Aplodontia rufa [24]. Both these
>> semi-aquatic rodents feed mainly on riverside herbs,
>> grasses and the bark of young trees."
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_beaver
> The Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa) is a primitive rodent *unrelated
> to beavers* and not always found in mountainous areas.

So??

My little boy, the're also *unrelated to capibaras*...
:-D

SFs are stupid stupid stupid.
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
DEER SMART APE AND FAKE APESrec.sport.prowrestling ·
1 2 3 4 5 6 7