|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Claudius DenkClaudius Denk Date: Apr 24, 2008 11:53
On Apr 24, 11:36Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> On Apr 24, 11:26Â am, Lee Olsen hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Apr 24, 9:19Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:>
>>> I don't know what you're so nervous about. Â It's not like you have a
>>> real hypothesis anyway.
>
>> ROFL, like you do?
>
>> Su Solomon: "I did take the trouble to read your five thousand four
>> hundred words of
>> your latest manifesto. From my reading of this, I gathered that in
>> the
>> intevening 11 months you have not appeared to have read any of the
>> comments or advice that were given to you last time you posted an ...
|
| Show full article (1.98Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Apr 24, 2008 12:23
On Apr 24, 11:53Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> On Apr 24, 11:36Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Apr 24, 11:26Â am, Lee Olsen hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Apr 24, 9:19Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:>
>>>> I don't know what you're so nervous about. Â It's not like you have a
>>>> real hypothesis anyway.
>
>>> ROFL, like you do?
>
>>> Su Solomon: "I did take the trouble to read your five thousand four
>>> hundred words of
>>> your latest manifesto. From my reading of this, I gathered that in
>>> the ...
|
| Show full article (2.67Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Claudius DenkClaudius Denk Date: Apr 24, 2008 12:30
Just think how much easier all of this would have been if you simply
made the retraction.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Claudius DenkClaudius Denk Date: Apr 24, 2008 12:32
Of course you could always just tell us what you do or do not thin
--
unless it's a secret or something.
Is it a secret?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mclarkmclark Date: Apr 24, 2008 13:04
On Apr 24, 2:32Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> Of course you could always just tell us what you do or do not think--
> unless it's a secret or something.
>
> Is it a secret?
What, the URL for your "new and improved" hypothesis?
I guess.....
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Claudius DenkClaudius Denk Date: Apr 24, 2008 22:48
On Apr 24, 1:04Â pm, mclark comcast.net> wrote:> On Apr 24, 2:32Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> Of course you could always just tell us what you do or do not think--
>> unless it's a secret or something.
>
>> Is it a secret?
>
> What, the URL for your "new and improved" hypothesis?
> I guess.....
Aren't you talking about the same (basically) hypothesis I've had
going on for about 5 years now? Why do you refer to it as new and
improved? And why don't you just use a search engine? I'm sure you'd
have no trouble finding it if you'd just put some effort into it.
Give it a try.
Let me know if you need help finding searchable words and phrases.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mclarkmclark Date: Apr 25, 2008 04:03
On Apr 25, 12:48Â am, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> On Apr 24, 1:04Â pm, mclark comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On Apr 24, 2:32Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:>
>>> Of course you could always just tell us what you do or do not think--
>>> unless it's a secret or something.
>
>>> Is it a secret?
>
>> What, the URL for your "new and improved" hypothesis?
>> I guess.....
>
> Aren't you talking about the same (basically) hypothesis I've had
> going on for about 5 years now? Â Why do you refer to it as new and
> improved? Â
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Apr 25, 2008 05:59
On Apr 24, 12:30Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> Just think how much easier all of this would have been if you simply
> made the retraction.
Make a retraction about what, the strawman you set up?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Apr 25, 2008 06:02
On Apr 24, 12:32Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:> Of course you could always just tell us what you do or do not think--
> unless it's a secret or something.
I already did tell you, how many times does something have to be
repeted for your
benifit?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Lee OlsenLee Olsen Date: Apr 25, 2008 06:09
On Apr 24, 10:48Â pm, Claudius Denk sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Aren't you talking about the same (basically) hypothesis I've had
> going on for about 5 years now?
You don't have a hypothesis, you have a manifesto based on imagining
voices saying "Â spears couldn't be used for fish." when they said no
such thing.
You have a manifesto based on "Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats."
You have a manifesto based on the delusions of an illiterate.
Su Solomon: "I did take the trouble to read your five thousand four
hundred words of
your latest manifesto. From my reading of this, I gathered that in
the
intevening 11 months you have not appeared to have read any of the
comments or advice that were given to you last time you posted an
extermely similiar 'unsubstantiated idea re evolution'. If you had
taken onboard any of the advised literature that was given at that
time, then if is not evident in this latest of postings."
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
