| Re: U.S. ANTHROPOLOGISTS PHONIER THAN $4 BILL -- Testing Confirms Ed Conrad CORRECT -- MAN AS OLD AS COAL -- Lin Liangtai of Taiwan Proves Existence of Conspiracy Against Truth .. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: sci.anthropoilogy · Group Profile
Author: DiggerDigger Date: Oct 1, 2007 02:41
"Ed Conrad" verizon.net> wrote in message
news:eln0g3110daieffqj6s5vtj1qnba5bsggr@4ax.com...> <
> EVALUATION OF A "CARBONIFEROUS HUMAN CALVARIUM FOSSIL"
> <
> The following report (below) was prepared by Lin Liangtai, a scholar
> and scientist in Taipei, Taiwan. He and I never met but Liangtai was
> impressed with my discoveries of petrified bones, teeth and soft
> organs -- some human -- between anthracite veins in Pennsylvania.
> <
> He communicated with me and his honesty and sincerity came shining
> through. So I sent him some of my specimens so he could conduct
> exhaustive testing.
> <
> His results confirm -- BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT -- that
> the specimens ARE petrified bones, teeth and soft organs -- some
> human -- which provides the physical evidence that man existed during,
> or even before, the time that anthracite coal was formed.
ENOUGH!
1. Who IS Lin Liangtai?
2. What are his credentials?
3. Where did he train?
4. What has he published in the scientific journals?
5. Would this be the same Lin Linagtai who claimed that Dinosaurs were
mammals?
Ed, who else has verified these results?
As you should know, one set of results does NOT prove anything "beyond
reasonable doubt". Anybody who wishes to claim any form of academic
integrity needs to have their results laid open to peer scrutiny and
verified. Have you sent your samples to any other laboratory? Would you be
prepared to send them to Cambridge University in the UK for analysis?
How many people have looked at your samples and said you have nothing of
interest?
If what you say is true, you are sitting on top of probably the most
important discovery EVER in the field of human origins!!!! It seems strange
to me that nobody is interested in it. Indeed, if what you say is true, why
would anybody with a serious academic interest in the topic NOT want to
believe you? Reputations are made by disproving theories. There must be
bus-loads of academics out there who would stampede to line up behind you if
your results really could be proven.
| 
