441712192872 nyyyyyYnnnnnYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynyynnynyynyyyyy
441712192873 yyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712192879 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyny
441712192905 yyyyyyYyyyynnYYYYNNNNNYYNYEYynyyynyyyyyyynyyyyy
441712192912 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYEEYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712192921 nyyyyyYyynyynEYYYYYYYYYEEYNYynnnnnynnynynyyyyyy
441712192949 yyyyyyYyyynynYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynn
441712192957 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYEYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192965 ynyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNYYYYYyynynyyynynyyyyyyyy
441712192969 ynnnnnYnnyyyyYNEEYYNYNEYEYNYnnnynyyyynNnyynnyny
441712192991 ynnyyyYyyyyynYYEEYYYYYYYEYYYynyyyynynnnEnnnnnnB
441712193000 nnynynNynnnnnNNNNYNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193010 yyyyyyYyynynyNYYEYEYYYYEYYNYyyynnnnyynNnynnnyny
441712193047 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYEyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193085 yyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193373 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyynnYnnnnnnB
441712193382 yyyyyyYyyyynyYYEYYYYYYYYEYEYnnnyynnyyyyyynnnyy
441712193398 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyynyyy
441712193434 nyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYEYNYYYYYYYynyyynnnyyyyyyyynyy
441712193496 ynyyyyYnnnynnNYEYNYEYYYYYYYEyyyynnnnnnyynnyyyyy ...

Faxes Sent to British Parliament logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 14,480 faxes to the British Parliament
in Westminster, of which 9,138 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 5,342 were sent via fax-modem direct from
my computer. The actual figure is obviously much higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to
be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712190076 nnnnnynnEnnnnnnYYNNYYYYNENNNNNynynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190179 yyyynnyyyYnyyyyynYYYNYYYYYYEYEEEyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyy
441712190189 yyynyyyyyYyyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190243...

A mysterious fruit. Does anybody know what kind of fruit this is?
http://www.haber7.com/haber.php?haber_id=281603

@........new programme for agricultural..........@

http://www.freewebs.com/medicsec/
http://www.bidvertiser.com/
http://bigchurch.com/go/g906803-pmem
http://indianfriendfinder.com/go/g906803-pmem

441712545950 yynyyEyynnnyyyynnn
441712565326 yyyyyYyyyyyyynnnnn
441712611290 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712613250 yyyyyNyyyyyyynyyyy
441712616023 y
441712626199 y
441712662563 y
441712671396 y
441712700618 y
441712706079 n
441712726653 n
441712734660 y
441712736421 y
441712748994 y
441712749630 y
441712765179 n
441712768633 n
441712780345 y
441712780504 n
441712784425 ynyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyn ...

Fanatic's Fare for the Common Man

Certainty level: 90%%

The article reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin
for the Features section of the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it
described the situation at the time and in particular a recent meeting with
a friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other than
my GP that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the
previous year and a half.

There is a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have
no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be
approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in his
eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you
will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48 books into your arms,
all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the same
meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80 at you.

Virgin Radio-Jon Holmes (4-5/Jan/2002)

Here are two segments from Virgin FM, one on Friday, the other on Saturday,
both from the Jon Holmes evening show.

Certainty level: 80%%

In early January 2002 I listened for the first time in some months to Virgin Radio,
specifically to the Jon Holmes evening show on Friday 4 January 2002. They promptly
attacked me verbally. Again, context is relevant. There are three instances in the
space of two minutes on this extract;

00:18 "are you lying?"
00:22 "it's not fair"
01:24 "everyone at the amateur c+ turbo programmers club found it hilarious"

The first phrase is a straight slander. MI5 were trying to portray me as a liar at
around this time; I have other audio with the same accusation. "are you lying?"; unsophisticated.

It's closely followed by the words "it's not fair". Note carefully the way he says it,
quickly, as if to deny what he says. The phrase "not fair" was first created by OCTS MD
H S.-W. in Nov/1992, and picked up on my first visit to hospital soon after
"they should have paid your fare").
Again, unsophisticated parrotting of a key phrase.

Software for sale. Huge Selection. 10 Euros/CD. Worldwide shipping.

Windows, Mac, and Linux. The very latest software, stock video/photo, games, etc.

Contact David for details:
david007@worldnewstonight.net

                                                                                                                                                             





^3BW/P-Vu