Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.woodworking only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

rec.woodworking Profile…
 Up
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Mike Marlow
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:04

hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0hqq449fbc47oalrj46d4bmrdkuhv4pjhv@4ax.com...
> For those of you that offered helpful suggestions, thanks very much.
> For thoses of you who were critical of my request suggesting I could
> have found thiese myself, get a life. Why waste bandwith with such
> nonsense. Who do you think you're helping?
>
> I've followed this group for maybe 10 years. Most of the time,
> everyong is willing to offer a helpful suggestion or two but once in a
> while, the jerks just must have their say. (And it is frequently the
> same jerks!)
>

Jerks? Just because they pointed out something kind of obvious? I don't
recall that any of those posters resorted to calling you any names for your
original post. Funny you should feel the need...

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: greatviewcsc
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:14

Thery are, in my humble opinion, jerks!

Why waste bandwidth with such suggestions? If one doesn't want to
help in a positive manor, or has nothing positive to add why not stay
silent? Who is helped by negative or non-helpful responses. Maybe
the sender gets satisfaction but I really don't think anyone else
finds such comments positive nor helpful to anyone.

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:04:43 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
alltel.net> wrote:
>
>hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:0hqq449fbc47oalrj46d4bmrdkuhv4pjhv@4ax.com...
>> For those of you that offered helpful suggestions, thanks very much.
>> For thoses of you who were...
Show full article (1.25Kb)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Pat Barber
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:21

> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Doug Winterburn
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:22

greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
> Thery are, in my humble opinion, jerks!
>
> Why waste bandwidth with such suggestions? If one doesn't want to
> help in a positive manor, or has nothing positive to add why not stay
> silent? Who is helped by negative or non-helpful responses. Maybe
> the sender gets satisfaction but I really don't think anyone else
> finds such comments positive nor helpful to anyone.
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:04:43 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
> alltel.net> wrote:
>
>> hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:0hqq449fbc47oalrj46d4bmrdkuhv4pjhv@4ax.com...
>>> For those of you that offered helpful suggestions, thanks very much.
>>> For thoses of you who were critical of my request suggesting I could
>>> have found thiese myself, get a life. Why waste bandwith with such
>>> nonsense. Who do you think you're helping?
>>> ...
Show full article (1.41Kb)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Mike Marlow
Date: Jun 9, 2008 11:33

hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2jsq445onq5s310tu2v20bgretn0296kl2@4ax.com...
> Thery are, in my humble opinion, jerks!
>
> Why waste bandwidth with such suggestions? If one doesn't want to
> help in a positive manor, or has nothing positive to add why not stay
> silent? Who is helped by negative or non-helpful responses. Maybe
> the sender gets satisfaction but I really don't think anyone else
> finds such comments positive nor helpful to anyone.
>

I didn't find the response to be too awful negative. A gentle nudge towards
google is often a good way to be encouraging. Most people that first post
to a forum like this typically later re-post about the abundance of
information they found using google. All in all, a good thing. I still
have a problem with the response that calls people jerks for doing exactly
what you are doing - expressing an opinion.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: RicodJour
Date: Jun 9, 2008 12:36

On Jun 9, 2:14 pm, greatview...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Thery are, in my humble opinion, jerks!
>
> Why waste bandwidth with such suggestions? If one doesn't want to
> help in a positive manor, or has nothing positive to add why not stay
> silent? Who is helped by negative or non-helpful responses. Maybe
> the sender gets satisfaction but I really don't think anyone else
> finds such comments positive nor helpful to anyone.

I've helped in a positive manor - a small manor, I think it was a two
door. ;)

As far as the bandwidth, that is no longer a concern for anyone as far
as I can tell. People's time, however, is always in short supply, and
what you've done is to ask a group of strangers to do a search for
you. If you searched and didn't find anything, well, hell, post away,
but otherwise it just comes across as laziness.

Don't worry about the jerk comment. I don't - I've been called far
worse by far better people! ;)

R
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Date: Jun 9, 2008 13:32

On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:14:44 -0400, greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
>Why waste bandwidth with such suggestions?

Have you considered that replying in the way you have might possibly
cause someone's opinion of slide down hill?

Mark
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: B A R R Y
Date: Jun 9, 2008 14:44

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:33:39 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
alltel.net> wrote:
>I didn't find the response to be too awful negative. A gentle nudge towards
>google is often a good way to be encouraging.

I look at it as teaching a man to fish.

Myself, I'll often post a link directly to the search.

The OP can then reply with a "Has anyone used one of these?" or a
"Which of these three parts might work best?"

---------------------------------------------
** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html **
---------------------------------------------
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Flash
Date: Jun 9, 2008 18:24

Well, whatever you call it, a "gas strut" is what is in use on cars, and
they come in an infinite variety of sizes (lengths) and strengths.

For instance, the one on the hood of my new KIA might support a ten (or
more) pound toybox lid as well as it supports the hood of the car.

Flash

hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vbno445p65lr4k2ap5c8jrno4qh6a0a6qm@4ax.com...
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Andy Dingley
Date: Jun 10, 2008 15:09

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:32:51 -0400, greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
>There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
>than to slam of fingers.

Lee Valley do one. Their viscous damper is much better than any of the
spring-based ones.
no comments
1 2 3