Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.woodworking only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.woodworking Profile…
 Up
Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: greatviewcsc
Date: Jun 8, 2008 15:32

There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
type of device found on cars.)
23 Comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Han
Date: Jun 8, 2008 16:16

greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote in news:vbno445p65lr4k2ap5c8jrno4qh6a0a6qm@
4ax.com:
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)
>
There are smaller varieties appropriate for your use. You just have to
search for them .

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: bob kater
Date: Jun 8, 2008 16:16

lee valley, woodworkers supply
hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vbno445p65lr4k2ap5c8jrno4qh6a0a6qm@4ax.com...
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: evodawg
Date: Jun 8, 2008 16:24

greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)
--
"You can lead them to LINUX
but you can't make them THINK"
Running Mandriva release 2008.0 free-i586 using KDE on i586
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Nova
Date: Jun 8, 2008 16:24

greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)

There is such a device. For an example see:

http://www.rockler.com/product.cfm?Offerings_ID=410

--
Jack Novak
Buffalo, NY - USA
novasys@verizon.net
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Bob Kirkpatrick
Date: Jun 9, 2008 09:43

On Jun 8, 6:32 pm, greatview...@hotmail.com wrote:
> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
> type of device found on cars.)

Try www.mcmaster.com and search for gas springs. There are several
pages of gas springs and mounting brackets. These are not too
expensive for the small, low force units. These are hold open devices
like on a car. Proper geometry will allow the lid to stay open and
closed with or without a latch.
Search for Shock Absorbers and then select Shock Absorbers &
Dampers, page 1175 at present, for simple slow closers like automotive
shocks without springs.
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: RicodJour
Date: Jun 9, 2008 09:48

On Jun 8, 7:24 pm, evodawg nospam.net> wrote:
> greatview...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
>> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
>> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
>> type of device found on cars.)

Now how in the world would the OP have found that?! I mean come on -
it says in the description " Prevents lids from accidentally slamming
shut on fingers." and there's no way he could have found that without
searching for something obscure like, "prevent lid slam fingers". ;)

Google is the enemy, and you should keep your enemies close.

R
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: evodawg
Date: Jun 9, 2008 10:01

RicodJour wrote:
> On Jun 8, 7:24 pm, evodawg nospam.net> wrote:
>> greatview...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> There must be a simple device that allows a lid to close slowly rather
>>> than to slam of fingers. The lid(s) weigh maybe 10 pounds but can
>>> really cause an injured finger. ( The lid is much too light for the
>>> type of device found on cars.)
>
> Now how in the world would the OP have found that?! I mean come on -
> it says in the description " Prevents lids from accidentally slamming
> shut on fingers." and there's no way he could have found that without
> searching for something obscure like, "prevent lid slam fingers". ;)
>
> Google is the enemy, and you should keep your enemies close.
>
> R
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: greatviewcsc
Date: Jun 9, 2008 10:40

For those of you that offered helpful suggestions, thanks very much.
For thoses of you who were critical of my request suggesting I could
have found thiese myself, get a life. Why waste bandwith with such
nonsense. Who do you think you're helping?

I've followed this group for maybe 10 years. Most of the time,
everyong is willing to offer a helpful suggestion or two but once in a
while, the jerks just must have their say. (And it is frequently the
same jerks!)

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour
worldemail.com> wrote:
Show full article (1.31Kb)
no comments
Re: Preventing toy box lid from slamming shut         


Author: Gordon Shumway
Date: Jun 9, 2008 10:39

As far as you're concerned everyone is here to serve you?

On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:40:18 -0400, greatviewcsc@hotmail.com wrote:
>For thoses of you who were critical of my request suggesting I could
>have found thiese myself, get a life. Why waste bandwith with such
>nonsense.
no comments
1 2 3