WN new price policy
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.travel.air only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

rec.travel.air Profile…
 Up
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: John L
Date: Nov 10, 2007 10:25

>I couldn't find any good stats, but what I can tell you is that in
>Alberta (Canada, for the geographically challenged), gas at the pump was
>probably around $0.90 in the spring, rose to $1.10 or so, and is back to
>$0.95 right now.
>
>Not quite on topic, but hopefully a useful stat.

It'd be more useful for US readers if they knew that the price is per
litre.
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Mr Travel
Date: Nov 11, 2007 02:47

EVIL ELVIS ® wrote:
> On Nov 8, 9:04 pm, DevilsPGD crazyhat.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Just think of it this way, we're bigger and we're on top.
>
>
> You mean Canada is in Texas?
>
>
> --EE--
>

I think he meant Canada has more land area than the US
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Mr Travel
Date: Nov 11, 2007 02:50

Marty Shapiro wrote:
> "Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe.org:
>
>
>
>>
>>Vegas only has ONE runway, that could handle 747-400 or
>>A340 aircraft, needed for flights between vegas and China...
Show full article (1.32Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Marty Shapiro
Date: Nov 11, 2007 05:26

Mr Travel wrote in
news:4736de5a$0$8689$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> Marty Shapiro wrote:
>
>> "Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Vegas only has ONE runway, that could handle 747-400 or
>>>A340 aircraft, needed for...
Show full article (2.44Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Date: Nov 13, 2007 17:36

dgs wrote:
Show full article (0.80Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: dgs
Date: Nov 15, 2007 15:12

Larry in AZ wrote:
> Waiving the right to remain silent, dgs gmail.com> said:
>
>
>>Larry in AZ wrote:
>>
>>>Waiving the right to remain silent, johnl@iecc.com (John L) said:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I couldn't find any...
Show full article (0.96Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Chilly8
Date: Nov 18, 2007 03:02

X-No-Archive: Yes

"Marty Shapiro" SiliconSPAMNOTRallye.org> wrote in message
news:Xns99E41713EC153MartyN711BZ@207.115.17.102...
> "Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe.org:
>
> Zero wind, standard temperature, 0 gradient, 0' pressure altitude, a
> 747-400 with the CF6-80C2B1 engines can use a 6,500' runway at 700,000 lbs

Not according to Wikipedia. The specifications at Wikipedia say that a
747-400 needs 3018 meters for its takeoff run, and thats around
10,000 feet, so 6,500 feet would not nearly be enough. And 700,000
lbs would exceed MTOW. If I take off in a 747-400 at that weight,
FSPassengers will dock me points for exceeding MTOW. I can take
off safely at that weight level, but FSPassengers will dock me points
for exceeding MTOW.
.
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Marty Shapiro
Date: Nov 18, 2007 04:57

"Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fhp64r$h9m$1@aioe.org:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> "Marty Shapiro" SiliconSPAMNOTRallye.org> wrote in message
> news:Xns99E41713EC153MartyN711BZ@207.115.17.102...
>> "Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe...
Show full article (2.19Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: Andrew In Alabama
Date: Nov 18, 2007 08:39

Damb, Marty Shapiro SiliconSPAMNOTRallye.org>, do I have to
'splain EVERYTHING to your dumn ass????
>>> Zero wind, standard temperature, 0 gradient, 0' pressure altitude,
>>> a
>>> 747-400 with the CF6-80C2B1 engines can use a 6,500' runway at
>>> 700,000 lbs
>>
>> Not according to Wikipedia...
Show full article (1.21Kb)
no comments
Re: WN new price policy         


Author: fxd99
Date: Nov 18, 2007 10:18

Andrew In Alabama wrote:
> Damb, Marty Shapiro SiliconSPAMNOTRallye.org>, do I have to
> 'splain EVERYTHING to your dumn ass????
>
>
>
>>>> Zero wind, standard temperature, 0 gradient, 0' pressure altitude,
>>>> a
>>>>747-400 with the CF6-80C2B1 engines can use a 6,500' runway at
>>>>700,000 lbs
>>>
>>>Not according to Wikipedia. The specifications at Wikipedia say that a
>>>747-400 needs 3018 meters for its takeoff run, and thats around
>>>10,000 feet, so 6,500 feet would not nearly be enough. And 700,000
>>>lbs would exceed MTOW. If I take off in a 747-400 at that weight,
>>>FSPassengers will dock me points for exceeding MTOW. I can take
>>>off safely at that weight level, but FSPassengers will dock me points
>>>for exceeding MTOW.
>>>.
>> ...
Show full article (1.17Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Sale Price Seiko Chronograph Fake - Seiko Minimum Price Wholesalerec.games.tradingcards.misc ·
1 2 3 4