|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DevilsPGDDevilsPGD Date: Nov 8, 2007 20:04
>On Nov 8, 7:21 pm, DevilsPGD crazyhat.net> wrote:
>
>> (Canada, for the geographically challenged)
>
>Canada? Where's that? :>)
Just think of it this way, we're bigger and we're on top.
--
You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: DevilsPGDDevilsPGD Date: Nov 8, 2007 20:04
>If I'm not mistaken that is for a liter of gas, even though
>the Imperial gallon is 5 liters, lets just multiply it by
>four, so gas is approximately $3.80 an American
>gallon, plus or minus a couple ounces.
Correct. However, since taxes and currency is different, it's not an
entirely fair comparison (although it's fairly close these days)
More important is the percentage of increase vs decrease from an
arbitrary point in the past. In short, we're close to the price of
earlier this year.
--
You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than just a kind word.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: CLM in NDCLM in ND Date: Nov 8, 2007 20:05
EVIL ELVIS ® wrote:
>
>
> Canada? Where's that? :>)
>
>
> --EE--
>
Why, it's the land of hockey, whisky (that's how they spell it), &
ginger ale. Located due north.
Cameron
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Rick BlaineRick Blaine Date: Nov 8, 2007 20:27
Duh_OZ gmail.com> wrote:
>I was referring to their new 3 tier price structure. IIRC they had
>a 5 tier before?
They still do. It's just that they lump the fares into three buckets first.
--
"Tell me what I should do, Annie."
"Stay. Here. Forever." - Life On Mars
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Chilly8Chilly8 Date: Nov 9, 2007 23:25
X-No-Archive: Yes
"flip" nospam.com> wrote in message
news:kumdnSuQ6ckj-K7anZ2dnUVZ8sjinZ2d@giganews.com...
> DocDice wrote:
>> On Nov 8, 11:46 am, Duh_OZ gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Holy sheet - don't think I'll be repeating my (MDW->LAS) $138.80 R/T
>>> on SWA anytime soon.
>>
>> Expect airline pricing to only go higher as we continue to compete
>> with China for the same oil.
>>
> I suppose that means flights from China to Vegas are going up too.
> --flip,
Vegas only has ONE runway, that could handle 747-400 or
A340 aircraft, needed for flights between vegas and China.
7L/25R, with a length of 14495 ft, is the only runway long
enough to handle 747 or A340 aircraft. A 747 needs at least
11,000 feet of runway for takeoff, so all the other runways
are not long enough.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: EVIL ELVIS ®EVIL ELVIS ® Date: Nov 9, 2007 23:43
On Nov 8, 9:04 pm, DevilsPGD crazyhat.net> wrote:
> Just think of it this way, we're bigger and we're on top.
You mean Canada is in Texas?
--EE--
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: EVIL ELVIS ®EVIL ELVIS ® Date: Nov 9, 2007 23:44
On Nov 8, 9:05 pm, CLM in ND hotmail.com> wrote:
> Why, it's the land of hockey, whisky (that's how they spell it), &
> ginger ale. Located due north.
Talk about whisky.... I drank a great sake last night called 'Dreamy
Clouds' from the Rihaku brewery. Good stuff.
--EE--
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Marty ShapiroMarty Shapiro Date: Nov 10, 2007 02:16
"Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe.org:
>
>
> Vegas only has ONE runway, that could handle 747-400 or
> A340 aircraft, needed for flights between vegas and China.
> 7L/25R, with a length of 14495 ft, is the only runway long
> enough to handle 747 or A340 aircraft. A 747 needs at least
> 11,000 feet of runway for takeoff, so all the other runways
> are not long enough.
>
>
>
Nonsense.
Instead of using your silly game, why don't you try looking at the
runway specifications for the 747 as provided by Boeing. If you had, you
would have known that a 747-400 can use a runway under 6,000' in some
conditions. You only need 7L/25R under max load and very high density
altitude conditions.
|
| Show full article (1.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BOBBOB Date: Nov 10, 2007 05:46
On Nov 8, 9:05 pm, CLM in ND hotmail.com> wrote:
> EVIL ELVIS
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Burt CohenBurt Cohen Date: Nov 10, 2007 06:36
Marty Shapiro wrote:
> "Chilly8" hotmail.com> wrote in news:fh3me6$j38$1@aioe.org:
>
>
>
>>
>>Vegas only has ONE runway, that could handle 747-400 or
>>A340 aircraft, needed for flights between vegas and China.
>>7L/25R, with a length of 14495 ft, is the only runway long
>>enough to handle 747 or A340 aircraft. A 747 needs at least
>>11,000 feet of runway for takeoff, so all the other runways
>>are not long enough.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Nonsense.
>
> Instead of using your silly game, why don't you try looking at the ...
|
| Show full article (1.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|