Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Dr. GroundAxeDr. GroundAxe Date: May 10, 2008 11:05
That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
. Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
season
|
| |
|
| | 28 Comments |
|
  |
Author: *skriptis*skriptis Date: May 10, 2008 11:10
> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name .
> Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
> season
He has two slams, YEC, slam final and a semi.
Ranking works fine.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: robinrobin Date: May 10, 2008 11:15
On 10 May, 18:05, "Dr. GroundAxe" hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
> season
The one year rolling ranking system is not perfect, but do you have a
better system?
How would you objectively determine the rankings?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Joe RamirezJoe Ramirez Date: May 10, 2008 11:17
On May 10, 2:05Â pm, "Dr. GroundAxe" hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
> season
So you are advocating rankings based on a four- or five-month rolling
period?
Joe Ramirez
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sakari LundSakari Lund Date: May 10, 2008 11:24
On Sat, 10 May 2008 18:05:40 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe"
hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
>is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
>. Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
>season
Do you have any idea about how rankings work? Do you have any idea
about anything?
How long can a person post in a newsgroup only trolling?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: markomarko Date: May 10, 2008 11:34
fed has comfortable lead due to his last year points.sure he can stay no1
till 2009 even without winning majors but only if djoko or rafa doesnt
improve on their last year points.
but if fed doesnt make more points than djoko say from RG till end of 2008
he will lose no1 position because he has to defend about the same amount of
points more than he has as advantage.so race points will reflect situation
well in the other part of the season.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Adam ThirnisAdam Thirnis Date: May 10, 2008 11:45
Dr. GroundAxe wrote:
> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
> season
nadal's won 3 tournaments in almost a year - 1 masters and 2 mickey
mouse ones. hardly #1 material...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr. GroundAxeDr. GroundAxe Date: May 10, 2008 12:01
Sakari Lund wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 18:05:40 GMT, "Dr. GroundAxe"
> hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
>> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
>> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
>> season
>
> Do you have any idea about how rankings work? Do you have any idea
> about anything?
>
> How long can a person post in a newsgroup only trolling?
You tell me?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr. GroundAxeDr. GroundAxe Date: May 10, 2008 12:03
Adam Thirnis wrote:
> Dr. GroundAxe wrote:
>> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
>> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
>> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
>> season
>
> nadal's won 3 tournaments in almost a year - 1 masters and 2 mickey
> mouse ones. hardly #1 material...
And Federer has won one in about 6 months.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: wkhedrwkhedr Date: May 10, 2008 12:19
On May 10, 2:17Â pm, Joe Ramirez netzero.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 2:05Â pm, "Dr. GroundAxe" hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> That Federer remains ranked #1 shows what a nonsense the ranking system
>> is. Here we are in may, and he was 1 mickey mouse tournament to his name
>> . Both Nadal and Djokovic have outperformed him since the start of the
>> season
>
> So you are advocating rankings based on a four- or five-month rolling
> period?
>
> Joe Ramirez
He would like any system that works against Federer.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|