Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
rec.sport.rowing only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

rec.sport.rowing Profile…
 Up
Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: RoCoach
Date: May 29, 2008 20:26

I really don't know how to respond. This is what some idiot named
"Caustic" has posted in the US wrt to the NSR swampings and the
discussion it prompted:

"Just this morning at practice, one of our master's men's 4s swamped.
So, keep that in mind when I write this.

Rowing deaths are by far the exception. Over the last 100 years of
rowing, with hundreds of thousands of rowers, the actual deaths
attributed to rowing are less than 200. That's over a CENTURY of
rowing. The odds of dying from a rowing incident are less than being
struck by lightning. Rowing is safer than driving your car, flying an
airplane, and even chewing gum!

With that in mind, is it really worth it to increase the safety of the
boats? What would be next? Quick-release oarlocks? Ejection seats?
What defines reasonable or unreasonable risk?

My opinion is that bouyancy is nice, but not required. You can only
stupid-proof things so much, and I think boatmakers don't do it
because they could actually run the risk of INCREASED litigation, by
leading the rowers to think that their boat is a viable flotation
device. It is not, and has never been recognized as such by the USCG.
Show full article (3.34Kb)
220 Comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: Carl Douglas
Date: May 29, 2008 21:10

RoCoach@gmail.com wrote:
> I really don't know how to respond. This is what some idiot named
> "Caustic" has posted in the US wrt to the NSR swampings and the
> discussion it prompted:
>
>
>
> "Just this morning at practice, one of our master's men's 4s swamped.
> So, keep that in mind when I write this.
>
< juvenile garbage snipped>
>
> It's not their problem that people are stupid. Smart people should
> take pains to ensure that stupid people aren't in a position to make
> stupid mistakes."

That's an arrogant, know-nothing fool who:
Show full article (1.60Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: RoCoach
Date: May 29, 2008 21:41

So, I hear about swampings because kids' coaches were stupid. Should
we not allow coaches for kids? After all, it was THEIR fault that they
went out in those conditions. Be smart enough to understand that
liability rests with teh person, not the object. If anyone should be
sued, it should be the coach.

As for fatalities, There's been less than 20 in the last 20 years. How
many MILLIONS of people have rowed or are rowing in the last 20 years?
At least 1 million in the US.

Talk to ANY safty expert out there, and they'd drool if they had a
99.99999%% success rate. Stop trying to fearmonger and invent reasons
for parents to shelter their kids more.

You act like deaths happen every day in rowing - but they do not. They
don't even happen every YEAR in rowing. More people die from cycling
in a year than rowing - should be put governors on cycle wheels, so
that they don't go to fast? Should we pass a law requiring all
bicycles to have training wheels on at all times? Should we pass a law
requiring all cyclists to have taken a bicycling course & pass a
cycling test?
Show full article (2.21Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: RoCoach
Date: May 29, 2008 21:45

On May 29, 12:41 pm, RoCo...@gmail.com wrote:
> So, I hear about swampings because kids' coaches were stupid. Should
> we not allow coaches for kids? After all, it was THEIR fault that they
> went out in those conditions. Be smart enough to understand that
> liability rests with teh person, not the object. If anyone should be
> sued, it should be the coach.
>
> As for fatalities, There's been less than 20 in the last 20 years. How
> many MILLIONS of people have rowed or are rowing in the last 20 years?
> At least 1 million in the US.
>
> Talk to ANY safty expert out there, and they'd drool if they had a
> 99.99999%% success rate. Stop trying to fearmonger and invent reasons
> for parents to shelter their kids more.
>
> You act like deaths happen every day in rowing - but they do not. They
> don't even happen every YEAR in rowing. More people die from cycling
> in a year than rowing - should be put governors on cycle wheels, so
> that they don't go to fast? Should we pass a law requiring all
> bicycles to have training wheels on at all times? Should we pass a law ...
Show full article (4.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: RoCoach
Date: May 29, 2008 21:54

"Caustic" continues to sound-off:

"So, I hear about swampings because kids' coaches were stupid. Should
we not allow coaches for kids? After all, it was THEIR fault that they
went out in those conditions. Be smart enough to understand that
liability rests with teh person, not the object. If anyone should be
sued, it should be the coach.

As for fatalities, There's been less than 20 in the last 20 years. How
many MILLIONS of people have rowed or are rowing in the last 20 years?
At least 1 million in the US.

Talk to ANY safty expert out there, and they'd drool if they had a
99.99999%% success rate. Stop trying to fearmonger and invent reasons
for parents to shelter their kids more.

You act like deaths happen every day in rowing - but they do not. They
don't even happen every YEAR in rowing. More people die from cycling
in a year than rowing - should be put governors on cycle wheels, so
that they don't go to fast? Should we pass a law requiring all
bicycles to have training wheels on at all times? Should we pass a law
requiring all cyclists to have taken a bicycling course & pass a
cycling test?
Show full article (2.21Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: causticmeatloaf
Date: May 30, 2008 01:47

On May 29, 12:10 pm, Carl Douglas carldouglas.co.uk> wrote:
> That's an arrogant, know-nothing fool who:
>
> 1. Doesn't understand statistics when spouting about numbers of rowing
> deaths.
> 2. Doesn't understand that rowing deaths are heavily under-reported &
> under-recorded.
> 3. Never met someone who lost a son or daughter because the boat sank.
> 4. Doesn't understand that conditions may change from good to deadly
> without warning. Nor that you may have no way to get home first
> 5. Doesn't want boats that always float (which costs nothing), bleats on
> about risks being part of life, but then demands that he, poor darling,
> be always chaperoned by a launch (which costs lots).
>
> As for talking about people being stupid - it might be best if people as
> stupid as him were not in a position to sound off.
>
> Carl
Show full article (5.23Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: Mike Sullivan
Date: May 30, 2008 02:20

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c39b213-e72c-413e-9171-ce8045db7a30@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> On May 29, 12:10 pm, Carl Douglas carldouglas.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> That's an arrogant, know-nothing fool who:
>>
>> 1. Doesn't understand statistics when spouting about numbers of rowing
>> deaths.
>> 2. Doesn't understand that rowing deaths are heavily under-reported &
>> under-recorded.
>> 3. Never met someone who lost a son or daughter because the boat sank.
>> 4. Doesn't understand that conditions may change from good to deadly
>> without warning. Nor that you may have no way to get home first
>> 5. Doesn't want boats that always float (which costs nothing), bleats on
>> about risks being part of life, but then demands that he, poor darling,
>> be always chaperoned by a launch (which costs lots).
>>
>> As for talking about people being stupid - it might be best if people as
>> stupid as him were not in a position to sound off.
>> ...
Show full article (5.23Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: Charles Carroll
Date: May 30, 2008 03:13

Mike -

The summer before last at OWRC I arrived one morning to find a kid all
fitted out an ready to go. His shell was at the dock. The sculls were in the
oarlocks. Ellen asked if I would mind going out with him. That's how I found
out that it is in OWRC's rules that no one under 18 years is allowed to go
out by themselves. Immediately I said yes, and we had a good time.

You can drive up the road a few miles to the Marin Rowing Club where the
water is much nicer. There they let kids go out by themselves.

Charles
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: bookie
Date: May 30, 2008 04:08

On May 29, 7:26 pm, RoCo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I really don't know how to respond. This is what some idiot named
> "Caustic" has posted in the US wrt to the NSR swampings and the
> discussion it prompted:
>
> "Just this morning at practice, one of our master's men's 4s swamped.
> So, keep that in mind when I write this.
>
> Rowing deaths are by far the exception. Over the last 100 years of
> rowing, with hundreds of thousands of rowers, the actual deaths
> attributed to rowing are less than 200. That's over a CENTURY of
> rowing. The odds of dying from a rowing incident are less than being
> struck by lightning. Rowing is safer than driving your car, flying an
> airplane, and even chewing gum!
>
> With that in mind, is it really worth it to increase the safety of the
> boats? What would be next? Quick-release oarlocks? Ejection seats?
> What defines reasonable or unreasonable risk?
>
> My opinion is that bouyancy is nice, but not required. You can only ...
Show full article (4.30Kb)
no comments
Re: Idiotic Post on RowingIllustrated.com         


Author: bookie
Date: May 30, 2008 04:18

>  To assume that you should take into account every
> conceivable contingency is ludicrous, and ultimately(even
> insignificantly though it may be), is a burden that you're asking boat
> makers to assume, at little to no charge.  Quite honestly, there's no
> demand for it, and as such, being in a free capitalist market, they
> are not necessitated to fulfill a need that does not exist. I will not
> stop you from encouraging boat makers to seal bulkheads - but don't do
> it out of some conspiracy theory that boat makers are somehow turning
> their noses up at pining cries of rowers dying in the water.  Boat
> makers live & die based on their customers. If their customers don't
> ask for something, they don't make it.
>
hmmmm, let us ask a boatbuilder to see if he is prepared to make fully-...
Show full article (1.15Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9