|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: StanStan Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:18
On Mar 27, 12:14Â pm, Christopher A. Lee optonline.net> wrote:> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>> Who takes it out on atheists instead.
Christopher (and considering your religious beliefs, your name is
ironic, but I digress....),
I have basically ignored you because you don't engage in any sort of
discussion; rather, you simply "declare" that what I'm posting are
"lies".
What I will tell you is that your assertion is totally baseless. The
TRUTH, as I've posted NUMEROUS times, is that in dealing with the
boys, I personally don't know, want to know, or care what a boy's
religion is or isn't. That's because "freedom of religion" is also an
integral part of our nation's heritage, and any attempt to require a
person to discuss his beliefs violates that freedom.
|
| Show full article (2.41Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: StanStan Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:22
On Mar 27, 1:01Â pm, Carl Kaufmann cox.net> wrote:> Stan wrote:
>> And as I see it, boys of all religions can join, and boys with no
>> religious affiliation can join; in short, ALL boys can join. Â The fact
>> that they need to include their Duty to God and Country in their Code
>> of Conduct should not present a problem to ANY American boy, since
>> ours is a  nation given to us by God, as first stated in our Birth
>> Certificate (the Declaration of Independence), and reaffirmed
>> countless times since then.
> The U.S.A.'s birth certificate was the Treaty of Paris.
You are mistaken. The United States didn't need England's
"permission" to be born. The treaty, among other things, was simply
England's acknowledgment of what already existed for more than 7
years.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:36
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 12:14Â pm, Christopher A. Lee optonline.net> wrote:>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>>
>
>> Who takes it out on atheists instead.
>
>Christopher (and considering your religious beliefs, your name is
>ironic, but I digress....),
What "religious beliefs" are you lying about, liar?
The name has been in the family for generations. As have Anglo Saxon
and other names.
It's something to do with honouring grandparents WHO WERE ALSO
ATHEIST.
But a bigoted, nasty sociopath like you can't understand this sort of
thing.
|
| Show full article (4.33Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: HatterHatter Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:38
On Mar 27, 11:54Â am, Stan hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Tell me Stan, why did the city of Colorado Springs decide that
>> a HUD grant to the Pike's Peak council Scoutreach program was
>> in violation of HUD requirements?
>
> To get to the other side.
dishonest evasion noted
Hatter
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 11:00
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:38:38 -0700 (PDT), Hatter gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 11:54Â am, Stan hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Tell me Stan, why did the city of Colorado Springs decide that
>>> a HUD grant to the Pike's Peak council Scoutreach program was
>>> in violation of HUD requirements?
>>
>> To get to the other side.
>
>dishonest evasion noted
I don't what it is about scouting. Whether it is the BSA or the
individual that comes up with the bigoted falsehoods about us that
they repeat to our faces.
But a few years back I had a colleague who was like Stan Krieger, but
not as nasty.
He couldn't grasp how stupid, offensive and counter-productive it was
to try and "justify" the organisation's bigotry and discrimination to
those it discriminated against.
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: StanStan Date: Mar 27, 2008 11:23
On Mar 27, 1:36Â pm, Christopher A. Lee optonline.net> wrote:> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
> wrote:>
> Was it some other liar also called "Stan Krieger" who lied about
> atheists "who use 6-17 year old boys as pawns in their fight to
> destroy our nation's heritage and values"?
Anybody who goes to court or other government bodies to block BSA
access to American boys is going after the boys themselves, because
the boys are the ones who lose by not having access to BSA.
> You have repeated this personally nasty falsehood every time you have
> cross-posted to the atheists newsgroups.
It is not a falsehoold.
|
| Show full article (5.80Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: J. Hugh SullivanJ. Hugh Sullivan Date: Mar 27, 2008 12:30
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:14:59 -0700 (PDT), Chimp
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 27 Mar, (J. Hugh Sullivan)wrote:
>> On Wed, Brian Westley
>>
>>>For all you whiners out there, the city manager is looking
>>>into Learning For Life programs. You know, the BSA program
>>>that doesn't discriminate on the basis of religion or
>>>sexual orientation.
>>
>> In the interest of accuracy It should also be stated that BSA
>> discriminates on the basis of lack of religion.
>
>Given that my dictionary defines "religion"
>as "the belief in and worship of a supernatural
>controlling power, especially a personal God
>or gods", Merlyn's statement becomes "that
>BSA discriminates on the basis of belief in ...
>a personal God".
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: J. Hugh SullivanJ. Hugh Sullivan Date: Mar 27, 2008 12:34
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:20:28 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
optonline.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:10:43 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>>>On Mar 27, 10:41
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 11:42
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:23:26 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 1:36Â pm, Christopher A. Lee optonline.net> wrote:>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
>> wrote:>
>>
>> Was it some other liar also called "Stan Krieger" who lied about
>> atheists "who use 6-17 year old boys as pawns in their fight to
>> destroy our nation's heritage and values"?
>
>Anybody who goes to court or other government bodies to block BSA
>access to American boys is going after the boys themselves, because
>the boys are the ones who lose by not having access to BSA.
Liar. They are going for equal rights for atheists.
As it stands, atheist kids lose by not having access to the BSA.
Why do you keep repeating this lie?
|
| Show full article (7.88Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Brian WestleyBrian Westley Date: Mar 27, 2008 11:44
Stan hotmail.com> writes:>On Mar 27, 1:36=A0pm, Christopher A. Lee optonline.net> wrote:>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
>> wrote:>>
>> Was it some other liar also called "Stan Krieger" who lied about
>> atheists "who use 6-17 year old boys as pawns in their fight to
>> destroy our nation's heritage and values"?
>Anybody who goes to court or other government bodies to block BSA
>access to American boys is going after the boys themselves, because
>the boys are the ones who lose by not having access to BSA.
Oh, like the atheist boys that the BSA itself says can't join?
Oh, they don't count.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
