|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:20
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:10:43 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 10:41Â am, Chimp yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I note your inability/unwillingness to explain why one sort of
>> religious discrimination is any different from another.
>
>As I see it, and have explained to you multiple times, the BSA Code of
>Conduct does not expect anything from its members that constitutes
>religious discrimination.
No, you have repeatedly lied about it.
>> Oh, silly me, of course the difference is that Stan is included by one
>> but excluded by the other.
>
>And as I see it, boys of all religions can join, and boys with no
>religious affiliation can join; in short, ALL boys can join. The fact
Unless they are atheist, liar.
>that they need to include their Duty to God and Country in their Code
To the God of somebody else's religion, liar.
|
| Show full article (1.47Kb) |
|
| | 21 Comments |
|
|
Author: StanStan Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:23
On Mar 27, 11:05Â am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:
>
> What makes it invalid, you intellectual coward? Â Isn't America
> wonderful that kikes like yourself have the right not to join
> Restricted clubs?
The Boy Scout program is about having fun while building character,
and spiritual understanding and growth is one VERY SMALL part of the
overall program.
You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? Fine. Then you
don't have to join. PERIOD.
|
| Show full article (1.11Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:26
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:23:08 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 11:05Â am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:
>>>
>> What makes it invalid, you intellectual coward? Â Isn't America
>> wonderful that kikes like yourself have the right not to join
>> Restricted clubs?
>
>The Boy Scout program is about having fun while building character,
>and spiritual understanding and growth is one VERY SMALL part of the
>overall program.
>
>You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? Fine. Then you
>don't have to join. PERIOD.
>
>But the BOTTOM LINE still remains is that what BSA requires wrt Duty
>to God is fully consistent with our nation's values, culture, 0
Liar.
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HatterHatter Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:39
On Mar 27, 11:10Â am, Stan hotmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 27, 10:41Â am, Chimp yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I note your inability/unwillingness to explain why one sort of
>> religious discrimination is any different from another.
>
> As I see it, and have explained to you multiple times, the BSA Code of
> Conduct does not expect anything from its members that constitutes
> religious discrimination.
>
>> Oh, silly me, of course the difference is that Stan is included by one
>> but excluded by the other.
>
> And as I see it, boys of all religions can join, and boys with no
> religious affiliation can join; in short, ALL boys can join  The fact
> that they need to include their Duty to God and Country in their Code
> of Conduct should not present a problem to ANY American boy, since
> ours is a  nation given to us by God, as first stated in our Birth
> Certificate (the Declaration of Independence), and reaffirmed
> countless times since then. ...
|
| Show full article (1.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Brian WestleyBrian Westley Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:46
Stan hotmail.com> writes:>On Mar 27, 11:05=A0am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>>
>> What makes it invalid, you intellectual coward? =A0Isn't America
>> wonderful that kikes like yourself have the right not to join
>> Restricted clubs?
>The Boy Scout program is about having fun while building character,
>and spiritual understanding and growth is one VERY SMALL part of the
>overall program.
>You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? Fine. Then you
>don't have to join. PERIOD.
Just like christ-killers like yourself don't have to join Restricted
clubs. PERIOD.
Tell me Stan, why did the city of Colorado Springs decide that
a HUD grant to the Pike's Peak council Scoutreach program was
in violation of HUD requirements?
---
Merlyn LeRoy
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: StanStan Date: Mar 27, 2008 08:54
On Mar 27, 11:46Â am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:> Stan hotmail.com> writes:>>On Mar 27, 11:05=A0am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>>You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? Â Fine. Â Then you
>>don't have to join. Â PERIOD.
>
> Just like christ-killers like yourself don't have to join Restricted
> clubs. Â PERIOD.
Three points-
1. It was the Romans who killed Jesus. They weren't going to let any
troublemakers create problems during the Passover pilgrammage that
would disrupt or challenge their political control over Judea. If
you're going to provide historical examples, at least get them right.
2. So Jews formed their own clubs, in the same way they bought resort
hotels in Miami Beach.
3. And your example is invalid anyway, as I already explained, so why
did you waste netwidth by posting it?
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Christopher A. LeeChristopher A. Lee Date: Mar 27, 2008 09:14
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Stan hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mar 27, 11:46Â am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>> Stan hotmail.com> writes:>>>On Mar 27, 11:05=A0am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>
>>>You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? Â Fine. Â Then you
>>>don't have to join. Â PERIOD.
>>
>> Just like christ-killers like yourself don't have to join Restricted
>> clubs. Â PERIOD.
>
>Three points-
>
>1. It was the Romans who killed Jesus. They weren't going to let any
>troublemakers create problems during the Passover pilgrammage that
>would disrupt or challenge their political control over Judea. If
>you're going to provide historical examples, at least get them right.
Not according to 2000 years of Christian history.
|
| Show full article (1.76Kb) |
| 11 Comments |
|
|
Author: Brian WestleyBrian Westley Date: Mar 27, 2008 09:43
Stan hotmail.com> writes:>On Mar 27, 11:46=A0am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>> Stan hotmail.com> writes:>>>On Mar 27, 11:05=3DA0am, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:>>>You don't feel that spiritual growth is necessary? =A0Fine. =A0Then you
>>>don't have to join. =A0PERIOD.
>>
>> Just like christ-killers like yourself don't have to join Restricted
>> clubs. =A0PERIOD.
>Three points-
>1. It was the Romans who killed Jesus. They weren't going to let any
>troublemakers create problems during the Passover pilgrammage that
>would disrupt or challenge their political control over Judea. If
>you're going to provide historical examples, at least get them right.
Nah, it was the Jews.
>2. So Jews formed their own clubs, in the same way they bought resort
>hotels in Miami Beach.
But at least they didn't have dishonest organizations like the BSA
using their tax money to compete with them.
|
| Show full article (1.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Carl KaufmannCarl Kaufmann Date: Mar 27, 2008 09:58
Stan wrote:
> On Mar 26, 3:06 pm, Brian Westley visi.com> wrote:
> >> For all you whiners out there, the city manager is looking
>> into Learning For Life programs. You know, the BSA program
>> that doesn't discriminate on the basis of religion or
>> sexual orientation.
>
> Are you confused Brian? Aren't you one of the whiners, in that you
> passionately oppose a program for American boys that expects nothing
> more from them than what already exists as part of our society,
> culture, and heritage?
You forgot to add, "and tax-payer money."
> Isn't America wonderful in that you have the right not to join such a
> program?
>
> "And secure the BLESSINGS of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity"-
> the Constitution of the United States
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Carl KaufmannCarl Kaufmann Date: Mar 27, 2008 10:01
Stan wrote:
> On Mar 27, 10:41 am, Chimp yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> I note your inability/unwillingness to explain why one sort of
>> religious discrimination is any different from another.
>
> As I see it, and have explained to you multiple times, the BSA Code of
> Conduct does not expect anything from its members that constitutes
> religious discrimination.
That must be why they told the Supreme Court of the United States
that they have the right to exclude atheists and homosexuals.
|
| Show full article (1.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
