> Eli Grubman wrote:

>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:37:18 +0000, Naked Gonad
>> tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>

>>> Eli Grubman wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:48:10 +0000, Naked Gonad
>>>> tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:06:35 +0000, Naked Gonad
>>>>>> tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:

> Peter Hucker wrote:

>> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:50:01 -0000, Naked Gonad tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>

>>> Peter Hucker wrote:

>>>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:17:47 -0000, Naked Gonad tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:12:00 -0000, Naked Gonad tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:

>>

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>

>>

> A better prank just thought of.
>
> Go next door off of BK prroperty, and videorecord them from inside the
> building next door or from outside the building next door.
>
> After all, you won't be on BK property while doing it so you can
> videorecord if it's your house or the house of a friend of yours.
>
> Then drive through there with a car without saafety lights installed,
> but a video of what you recorded of them earlier.
>
> They'll probably really freak out. You won't get a video of them
> freaking out this way, but they also WON'T find a camera ANYWHERE in
> this case.
>
> No matter how hard they try.
>
> Ooopsss! Never mind.
> ...

> On Dec 16, 9:51 am, "Frank Arthur" Arthurian.com> wrote:
>

>> You are the joke "radioguy" .
>> The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or  photography allowed".

>

>> It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot
>> take photographs or video recording. What's your problem?
>> Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules.

>
> You may be right. That might be a loophole. It's obvious that Burger
> King's intentions, for whatever reason, is so that there won't be any
> photographs or videorecordings of their employees.
>
> The SAFETY LIGHTS don't actually take "photographs" and don't do any
> "videorecoring" but they DO transmit live motion pictures in realtime
> which CAN be videorecorded by other people in their own homes.
>
> Which either photographic stills can be made from or can be left as a
> videorecording. ...

> On Dec 16, 9:51 am, "Frank Arthur" Arthurian.com> wrote:
>

>> You are the joke "radioguy" .
>> The Burger King sign says "no videorecording or  photography allowed".

>

>> It doesn't say yo cn't have a camera or camcorder. It says you cannot
>> take photographs or video recording. What's your problem?
>> Either don't go to Burger King r if you go follow their rules.

>
> Having safety lights that transmit pictures is photography, as far as
> Burger King is concerned.
>
> I already had a BK manager tell me to get rid of my "camera" that I
> was NOT taking any pictures with inside since "cameras aren't allowed
> and are illegal inside here".
>
> The reason I didn't take any pictures wth that "camera" was because it
> was NOT a "camera", but WAS a radio and tv set.
> ...

> http://nimbusters.org/hams/read.php?board=1&id=29306