Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: OsmiumOsmium
Date: Jul 21, 2008 16:29
Below is my proposed IQ scale based on how smart people seem. That is
a person with a 150 IQ seems alot smarter than twice as smart as a
person with a 75 IQ. (in fact they seem to me to be almost belonging
to different species).
Conventional IQ compared to My New IQ Scale (First number is
conventional IQ):
100=100
150=300
75 =50
|
| |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Mitch RaemschMitch Raemsch
Date: Jul 21, 2008 15:51
Rainbows are circles from the sky. science cannot explain them.
Heaven's light.
Mitch Raemsch; falling light changes colour
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: SanforizedSanforized
Date: Jul 21, 2008 10:00
Intelligence unfortunately does not regularly
correlate with maturity.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: OsmiumOsmium
Date: Jul 21, 2008 07:50
In 1996 V.Ramachandran proposed the "false alarm" theory of laughter.
That is, ancient humans would see what at first seemed to be something
dangerous (example, a snake). When one of these primitive humans
realized that the "snake" was only a stick he would emit a staccato
series of air expulsions to signal his fellow hominids "this seemingly
dangerous thing is harmless."
This theory explains why laughter is usually caused by 1). A
misapprehension, 2). Surprise, and 3) Finally a feeling of
superiority.
However some commentators have said that this theory doesn't explain
everything, such as why we laugh loudly when a fat man falls on his
face (but not a thin man.)
Another related theory of laughter does explain this "fat guy falls
down" type laughter. And it relates it to the false alarm theory We
laugh to tell others in the group that we too think what was just
observed, was in fact harmless.
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: OsmiumOsmium
Date: Jul 20, 2008 20:55
All discussions in this NG concerning a TOE are centered on subjects
such as inertia, gravity, and the unification of the known forces.
Yet modern physics indicates that all these topics concern phenomena
that are at least secondary or further removed from the true basics of
reality.
It's as if one group of ants is discussing the basics of a dropped ice
cream cone while another is discussing why a dead beatle is basic.
Better questions to ask are "What is a dimension?", "Why does math
indicate there are three or eleven or any other number of
dimensions?" "Why is there eternal inflation?"
Or how about this question, "Of what is a cubic centimeter of a black
hole composed?" Quarks?
P.S. Despite what you may think the title of this post does not
indicate it is merely a troll.
|
| |
|
4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Mitch RaemschMitch Raemsch
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:26
The Standard Model GUT. It's gravitational order that formed the solar
system. The chemical order that formed life that is electromagnetic.
The strong nuclear force that forms the nuclei of atoms. All these
forces in the standard model work together to give a Unfied Order.
Mitch Raemsch
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: BURTBURT
Date: Jul 20, 2008 16:21
The universe expands. In the beginning there is space-time hypersphere
surface that contains the orginal energy before matter. The strong
force concentrates that Dark Energy into neutrons or first matter as
infinitely dense point particles of mass.
The neutrons embeded on the surface of the expanded hypersphere decay
into protons electrons and neutrinos while giving off incidental
radiation that we now call CMBR. The protons and electrons formed
Hydrogen atoms and a little Helium.
Mitch Raemsch; Defining the Big Bang
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: BURTBURT
Date: Jul 20, 2008 14:39
Acceleration creates new motion through space and that creates the
appearence of movement around it. Take the Sun crossing the sky? That
has nothing to do with the Sun moving. It is an appearence caused by
the Earth rotating.
The station only appears to come to the train. Only the train felt
weight by accelerating. Only the train had that new motion through
space towards the station.
Mitch Raemsch
|
| |
|
7 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Jul 20, 2008 14:02
I am looking for an understandable definition
of angular momentum. Definitions abound on
the internet, but they are all incomprehensible,
at least to me:
http://tinyurl.com/5tfaxf
Beyond that, apparently the planets Jupiter and
Saturn possess some 90%% of our solar system's
angular momentum, all by themselves.
Can anyone explain these concepts to me, hopefully
in terms that my admittedly poor comprehensive
abilities can follow?
Appreciate it!
Hugh
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|