|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:12
On Dec 23, 11:03 pm, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:> “ Rebis “ wrote to me:
>
> Following so called "physics" the whole paragraph (God and Photon)
> becomes UTTERLY wrong, question of God aside.
>
> c IS NOT CONSTANT. Moreover, c IS NOT SPEED at all.
> And THAT IS the MAGIC.
>
> God bless
> ==================== . .
> S.
> Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
> absolutely black body problem.
> If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
> in area of absolutely black body (Kirchhoff’s Vacuum
> radiation /Max Laue / ) and does not radiate back,
> then “ terminal dead “ comes. In order to save the
> quantum of light from death Planck decided that
> it is possible that quantum of light will radiate this ...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:06
On Dec 22, 5:39 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." hovnanian.com> wrote:> socratus wrote:
>
>> God and Photon.
>
>> Absolute God is doing only One Thing.
>> In the beginning God creates virtual particles
>> as Quantum theory says.
>
>> And then He gives to these virtual particles spin/ impulse ,
>> Magic Constant of speed. The speed of these virtual particles
>> is constant: c=1, no matter how the source or the observer moves.
>
> So why didn't God get up one Tuesday and say, "I think I'll spin this
> batch of photons a bit faster today"? Or cook up a slow batch (80%% of
> c)?
>
> It appears that even God is bound by the underlying laws governing
> everything. So these laws are more powerful than God.
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:58
On Dec 21, 2:08 pm, Bluuuue Rajah wrote:
> Hans van Eynsbergen wrote innews:1eq1a78inaw1e$.l2hnu4q1ozp1.dlg@40tude.net:
>>> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:52:32 GMT, Bluuuue Rajah who thought that every
>> major problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:
>
>>> It needs clients that allow the user to flag other users according to
>>> their behavior. If a guy (or girl!) is belligerent or anti-social, a
>>> user should be able to put a mark by his name, so that he knows there
>>> was trouble, the last time they crossed paths.
>
>> Sort of like the feedback on Ebay...
>> lol
>
> Precisely, except that you keep the information to yourself.
You do realize the mainstream intent of what having brown-nosed clowns
running every which way but lose represent, don't your?
~ BG
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:55
On Dec 21, 3:17 pm, Bluuuue Rajah wrote:
> Onideus Mad Hatter backwater-productions.net> wrote innews:ueitk4pq55eknulqoku7nhitlc6r7ld9sg@4ax.com:
>
>
>>> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:52:32 GMT, Bluuuue Rajah
>> wrote:
>
>>>It needs clients that allow the user to flag other users according to
>>>their behavior. If a guy (or girl!) is belligerent or anti-social, a
>>>user should be able to put a mark by his name, so that he knows there
>>>was trouble, the last time they crossed paths.
>
>> Here's better idea...get the fuck off the grid and go retard on back
>> to the ban happy Webbie land so you can be with "your kind". We
>> Netters are evolved moar than you socially stunted Webtards who have
>> to constantly run crying to mommy moderator to solve all your little
>> problems and fuckups. Most of which are fueled primarily by your
>> little *NEED* to play victim and use the words of others to hurt
>> yourself. If you can't stand the heat get the fuck off Usenet, Bitch. ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:50
On Dec 21, 4:52 am, Bluuuue Rajah wrote:
> It needs clients that allow the user to flag other users according to their
> behavior. If a guy (or girl!) is belligerent or anti-social, a user should
> be able to put a mark by his name, so that he knows there was trouble, the
> last time they crossed paths.
Hitler is no longer available, but you could always get GW Bush and
Dick Cheney to cover that basis of eliminating whatever rocks your
boat.
Google could also have made it easy for us to divert whomever we
wanted into a trash bin, such as into alt.astronomy.spam, or how about
rec.org.mensa.spam.
Of course that would have to include the real names, addresses and so
forth of whomever is voting others into the trash/spam folder.
Unfortunately, that requirement alone eliminates 99.9%% of Usenet as
not being allowed to vote either way.
~ BG
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:37
On Dec 9, 4:04 pm, cusanic...@ gmail.com wrote: >
> Timeless motion happens when particles wave functions collapse at the
> speed of light. This will be proven in the future.
Unfortunately, that plus everything else will happen in the future.
Too bad Earth doesn't seem to have a viable future, especially if our
hypersphere allows us to get sucked into the GA at 6.111e3 km/s.
Even though we can in fact see into the cosmic future, at least on
behalf of what other galactic realms have coming, or rather of belated
knowledge due to the unusually slow velocity of light, as for most
likely having already encountered their demise, and therefore it’s
another so what's the difference for us?
|
| Show full article (3.64Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: GeopeliaGeopelia
Date: Dec 26, 2008 12:19
"Runge13" bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:494f48e9$0$9417$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
