> On Mar 16, 3:42 pm, e...@chinagreenelvis.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> They're all kind of landmark albums for the Floyd if you consider the
>> subject. I mean, Piper was Syd Barrett's baby, it was what established
>> Floyd in the world of recorded music. It was a ridiculously successful
>> album so it's not just a landmark for Floyd but for music in general
>> as well. Dark Side of the Moon is something like one of the top
>> selling albums of all time if I'm not mistaken, and it's arguably the
>> "best" Pink Floyd album there is. Then you have the Wall, which is
>> Roger Waters' brainchild, and it signifies a complete turn for the
>> band in general. It's really the beginning of the end for the band,
>> despite being a musical masterpeice. By the time the Final Cut had
>> been made, the "Pink Floyd Sound" had been completely eradicated...

>

>> It's true that most people probably like one or two but not the third.
>> They are very radically different from each other in terms of style,
>> meaning, and mood. Unless you're a Pink Floyd Fanatic, of course, and
>> even then us Fanatics have our albums which we would rather skip out
>> on... Relics and The Final Cut for me...

>
> Inspite of being a big Floyd fan, I can say Floyd were the most hit
> (Dark Side) or miss (Atom Heart Mother) of the great bands (even at
> their peak).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -