|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: yes pink van led black rock!yes pink van led black rock! Date: Aug 9, 2007 10:50
Both bands seem to be the most popular of the real prog bands. Tull,
Floyd and Rush are not considered as genuine prog bands.
Also among the big 4 (Yes, Gensis, King Crimson, ELP), Yes and Genesis
have sold the most and probably have the most influence among the neo-
prog bands. And lets not forget both their lead singer (Anderson/
Gabriel) and frontman were major weirdo/hippies
My thoughts on the too...
Yes - had better melodies, were more straightforward and more ROCK and
were also better live
Genesis - were more POP, less wanky, and more arty
Both sold out in the 80s
Genesis went adult contemporary and Yes went "power rock" if that
means anything.
I think Yes sold out lesser than Genesis, especially since Yes still
play their prog songs, while Genesis seem to concentrate on their 80s
stuff a lot more.
|
| |
|
| | 90 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ChuckChuck Date: Aug 9, 2007 14:43
On Aug 9, 1:50?pm, yes pink van led black rock!
> And lets not forget both their lead singer (Anderson/
> Gabriel) and frontman were major weirdo/hippies
PG a "hippie"?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: frankbobfrankbob Date: Aug 9, 2007 15:56
i'm really surprised someone would still put a "yes vs genesis" thread still
in 2007...people were debating that in the seventies, and the problem is
that today everyone has his very own definition of progressive rock. And it
seems to me one had the pretention yet put a definitive answer to that.
"yes pink van led black rock!" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186681841.792770.30560@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Both bands seem to be the most popular of the real prog bands. Tull...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: NewsgroupsNewsgroups Date: Aug 9, 2007 21:15
> i'm really surprised someone would still put a "yes vs genesis" thread
> still
> in 2007...people were debating that in the seventies, and the problem is
> that today everyone has his very own definition of progressive rock. And
> it
> seems to me one had the pretention yet put a definitive answer to that.
>
I had the same thought. Has this guy been sleeping for 30 years in a back
yard bomb shelter?
Jim
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: GG AllinGG Allin Date: Aug 9, 2007 21:17
"yes pink van led black rock!" gmail.com> wrote in message
> Genesis - were more POP, less wanky,
Steve Hackett is less wanky than Steve Howe?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: GG AllinGG Allin Date: Aug 9, 2007 21:18
> On Aug 9, 1:50?pm, yes pink van led black rock!
>> And lets not forget both their lead singer (Anderson/
>> Gabriel) and frontman were major weirdo/hippies
>
> PG a "hippie"?
NO, but weirdo? Hell yeah.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
Author: FrankFrank Date: Aug 11, 2007 01:14
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: EironEiron Date: Aug 11, 2007 01:21
Frank wrote:
> ...and both drummers made shite solo albums...
Which band was best when Bill Bruford was playing for Genesis?
--
Eiron.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Steven SullivanSteven Sullivan Date: Aug 11, 2007 01:47
In alt.music.yes Frank gmx.net> wrote:
> ...and both drummers made shite solo albums...
Yes had two drummers, doofus. And Genesis has had three.
___
-S
"As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mark RaeMark Rae Date: Aug 11, 2007 03:05
> And Genesis has had three.
Eight, actually...
Chris Stewart
John Silver
John Mayhew
Phil Collins
Bill Bruford
Chester Thompson
Nir Zidkyahu
Nick D'Virgilio
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|