On Oct 14, 10:29 pm, Joe Ramirez
netzero.com> wrote:> On Oct 14, 8:00 pm, "S.F.BZY"
gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I just extracted the rock bands out of there. I dont really care for
>> solo artists
>
> How can any kind of music fan not like solo artists? That's not a
> genre of music -- it's the description of an organizational chart.
> Someone who likes early rock 'n roll will like at least some music by
> Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, etc.
Elvis was good but didnt write his own songs. The other two were okay.
Berry is a good guitaritst but his songs sounded the same.
>Someone who likes
> classic rock will like at least some music by Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix,
I consider Jimi Hendrix Experience as a band. I hate Bob Dylan and his
crap voice. He did write some good songs but most of his songs are
tedious
> Neil Young,
see bob dylan
> David Bowie,
arty farty. some songs were good
> Elton John,
bores me
> Eric Clapton,
Claption was shit when he was not in a band. Wonderful tonight, my ass
>Bruce Springsteen,
corporate shit rock. No better than the likes of Boston
> etc. Someone who likes early punk/new wave will like at least some
> music by Elvis Costello, Joe Jackson, Patti Smith, etc. Someone who
> likes funk and r&b will like at least some music by James Brown,
> Stevie Wonder, Prince, etc. Banishing an entire subset of some the
> greatest rock artists in history is simply absurd.
>
I dont like funk or r&b
> (Side point: Although both Bruce Springsteen and Tom Petty also put
> out "pure" solo albums, the E-Street Band and the Heartbreakers are as
> legitimate as any of the bands you left in.)
But both Springsteen and Petty are shit corporate music and they suck
>
> Joe Ramirez
