|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ZepFloYesZepFloYes Date: Aug 30, 2006 09:21
Top 5 experimental (if not prog) bands IMO. Tie breaker is number of
awesome (judged subjectively by me) albums.
1. Led Zeppelin: First 6 albums were awesome, albums 7-9 were average
2. Yes: 5 awesome albums (Yes, TYA, Fragile, CTTE, Relayer) and 6
average albums(Time and a Word, TFTFO, Tormato, Drama, 90125 and
Magnification)
3. Floyd: 5 awesome albums (TOATGOD, ASOS, Meddle, DSOTM, WYWH) and 4
average albums (AHM, Animals, TW, TDB)
4. Van Der Graaf Generator: 4 awesome albums (TLWCDIWTEO, HTHWATOO,
Pawn
Hearts, Godbluff), 5 average albums (AGM, Still Life, World Record,
TQZ/TPD, Present)
5. Velvet Underground: 3 awesome albums (VU and Nico, WL/WH, VU) and 1
average album (Loaded)
Among the experimental ones these are the ones which impress me the
most. There are other non-experimental bands like AC/DC, Beatles (two
of their albums are quite experimental... SPLHCB TWA), Clash, Rolling
Stones, Who who have produced some awesome albums too.
|
| Show full article (3.54Kb) |
|
| | 181 Comments |
|
|
Author: Caffe MochaCaffe Mocha Date: Aug 30, 2006 09:43
ZepFloYes wrote:
> Top 5 experimental (if not prog) bands IMO. Tie breaker is number of
> awesome (judged subjectively by me) albums.
>
> 1. Led Zeppelin: First 6 albums were awesome, albums 7-9 were average
> 2. Yes: 5 awesome albums (Yes, TYA, Fragile, CTTE, Relayer) and 6
> average albums(Time and a Word, TFTFO, Tormato, Drama, 90125 and
> Magnification)
> 3. Floyd: 5 awesome albums (TOATGOD, ASOS, Meddle, DSOTM, WYWH) and 4
> average albums (AHM, Animals, TW, TDB)
I am SHOCKED that these are your top three. Yet another obsessive list
to tell us what we already know -- these are your favoritest bands.
> 4. Van Der Graaf Generator: 4 awesome albums (TLWCDIWTEO, HTHWATOO,
> Pawn
> Hearts, Godbluff),
Don't you mean Goldbluff? Haahaha!
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: stanzstanz Date: Aug 30, 2006 10:30
ZepFloYes ha scritto:
> Top 5 experimental
Faust
Pink Floyd
United States Of America
Can
Velvet Underground
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: capolkcapolk Date: Aug 30, 2006 10:32
>On 30 Aug 2006 09:21:30 -0700, "ZepFloYes" yahoo.com> returned
Which informs us that "ever", in the dictionary he's using, means 11
days.
|
| |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: WesWes Date: Aug 30, 2006 11:33
Now that's funny!
Wes
hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:spibf2po2pijv064fkq84rpva6qborns4t@4ax.com...>>On 30 Aug 2006 09:21:30 -0700, "ZepFloYes" yahoo.com> returned>
> Which informs us that "ever", in the dictionary he's using, means 11
> days.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Gil Pferd UlrikGil Pferd Ulrik Date: Aug 30, 2006 11:37
ZepFloYes come on down:
>Top 5 experimental (if not prog) bands IMO. Tie breaker is number of
>awesome (judged subjectively by me) albums.
You're gay.
--
"So now you better stop
Reap in all your ruin
Peace and just get with it
Disband all you're losing" - Led Zeppelin, Immigrant Song
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: WesWes Date: Aug 30, 2006 11:50
Deep Purple Mark 1 = Innovative but average?
Wes
"ZepFloYes" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1156954890.461395.221740@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...> Top 5 experimental (if not prog) bands IMO. Tie breaker is number of
> awesome (judged...
|
| Show full article (3.95Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: capolkcapolk Date: Aug 30, 2006 12:02
It's like intelligent but stupid.
>"Wes" suite224.net> wrote:>Deep Purple Mark 1 = Innovative but average?
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: ZepFloYesZepFloYes Date: Aug 30, 2006 12:10
Wes wrote:
> Deep Purple Mark 1 = Innovative but average?
The albums were a little inconsistent and had some poor execution. The
recording quality was also pretty abysmal. In contrast their
straightforward hard rock album Deep Purple in Rock is very well
produced. Their execution also improved quite a lot with Mark II which
was much less experimental but kicked more ass than Mark 1.
>> Top 5 experimental (if not prog) bands IMO. Tie breaker is number of
...
|
| Show full article (4.56Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: capolkcapolk Date: Aug 30, 2006 12:14
On 30 Aug 2006 12:10:43 -0700, "ZepFloYes" yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Wes wrote:
>> Deep Purple Mark 1 = Innovative but average?
>The albums were a little inconsistent and had some poor execution. The
>recording quality was also pretty abysmal. In contrast their
>straightforward hard rock album Deep Purple in Rock is very well
>produced. Their execution also improved quite a lot with Mark II which
>was much less experimental but kicked more ass than Mark 1.
I was actually following you pretty good - then you had to go and get
all complex and technical there at the end.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
